Collaboration
Weak collaboration is permitted on problem sets. In this context the term “weak collaboration” means that two or more students may discuss the problems and their ways of approaching them, but each student must fully work out the problem and present only his or her own solution. Advice can be given and received, but no part of the solution can be copied from another, nor can identical portions appear in the submissions of two or more students. Any weak collaboration must be fully disclosed as part of the problem solution, for example by a phrase like “Alice Alison and Bob Robertson collaborated in part (b) by discussions of general approach.” Since weak collaboration involves discussions among two or more people, all must have compatible statements.
Help from people not taking this course is also permitted, provided that it is fully disclosed, and that the solution submitted was written in the privacy of the submitter’s own mind and body.
Strong collaboration is not permitted on problem sets. In this context the term “strong collaboration” is any collaboration in which work done by others is incorporated, with or without disclosure. Strong collaboration is normal and desirable in the work environment, where the principal purpose is to accomplish, as a team, some objective. In an academic setting, however, the purpose is to facilitate learning by each individual student, and strong collaboration does not support that goal.
It is, of course, a serious academic offense for a student to present another’s work as his or her own. It is also an offense to fail to report collaboration in accordance with course policy. Such offenses will be treated seriously.
Interests
Supply Chain Digest- How China Export Business Thrived in 2025 Despite Trump Tariffs
- US PMI for January Finally Breaks above Key 50 Mark that Separates US Manufacturing Expansion from Contraction
- Supply Chain Guru Predictions for 2026
- Supply Chain and Logistics Stock Report for Week Ending Jan. 30, 2026
- Supply Chain by the Numbers for Jan. 29, 2026
- Interact Analysis Slightly Raises Warehouse Automation Forecast, but Sill Sees only Modest Overall Growth
- Cargo Theft Value Soared 60 Percnt in 2025, CargotNet Finds
- Do not Plan on Lots of Humanoid Robots in Distribution Any Time Soon, Gartner Says
- Supply Chain and Logistics Stock Report for Week Ending Jan. 23, 2026
- Tariffs or not, the Port of Los Angeles Records 3rd Highest TEU Traffic in 2025
Port Technology International- APMT Apapa rolls out 4G LTE network
- APMT Pipavav unveils expansion project
- COSCO positive despite plummeting revenue
- Hutchison Ports and Egyptian Navy to build new container terminal
- Kalmar to supply Cambodian terminal with RTGs
- Europe leads the way as shipping steps up green tech research
- ABB and Kongsberg to work towards common data vessel infrastructure
- PSA Marine launches carbon cutting digital solution
- Port of Riga upgrades container handling fleet
- Mason Mega Rail project reaches new milestone
Marine Link- Norway Socialist Party Withdraws Support for LNG Electricity Project Opposition
- CK Hutchison Launches Arbitration over Panama Canal Ports Contract Ruling
- Fifteen Migrants Dead After Boat Collides with Greek Coast Guard Vessel
- Oil Prices Rise on U.S.-Iran Tensions
- ClassNK Fleet Cost Simulation Receives "Best Project Innovation Award'"
- U.S.-Flag Shipping on the Great Lakes Down in 2025
- Baron Weather Expands Services to Support Recreational, Commercial Maritime Operations
- BOEM Advances Second OBBBA Offshore Lease Sales
- ESVAGT-KMC JV Nets Long-Term Vessel Deal for Korea Offshore Wind Farm
- Port of Virginia Advances Capacity with Addition of ULCV Berth