Maritime Flag State Ratings

The International Chamber of Shipping (ICS) has released its latest Shipping Industry Flag State Performance Table for 2025/2026. This report is updated annually. Flag state performance is growing in importance for the shipping industry.

Rounds of sanctions are occurring often, including sanctions of registries. Some ships are changing registries or even using false registries. Shippers, brokers, and carriers need to know the status of the ships they will be using.

The report highlights the criteria used to rate the flag states. Green squares signify positive performance by a flag state. Red squares highlight potentially negative performance. Various shades of grey and some additional markings indicate what the report calls neutral indicators.

Port Shipping Control (PSC) authorities provide most of the data for the ratings. There are three principal agencies and one target list:

  • Paris Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) countries
  • Tokyo MOU countries;
  • United States Coast Guard (USCG) Qualship 21 program
  • Respective blacklists or target lists of the agencies.

To be identified via the Paris and Tokyo MOU white lists, a flag must have undergone at least one inspection in the previous three years. For the Qualship 21 program, a flag must have made at least three distinct arrivals in each of the previous three years. For the Target Lists, flags listed as ‘Medium Risk’ have a neutral indicator.

Ratification of international maritime conventions such as UNCLOS, IMO and ILO also factor in. Some states may have partially ratified or accepted these conventions, or may have legal conflicts preventing ratification. These are also considered in the ratings.

A short section of the table is displayed here:

Source: ICS Shipping Industry Flag State Performance Table 2025/2026

The PDF report is accessible here.

It’s very important to have an independent verification of the performance of flag states regarding the major maritime conventions. These ratings give interested parties information to help them follow up on the standards the ships they hire are meeting. Questions should be raised before booking passage.

Sam Chambers January 28, 2026

https://splash247.com/ics-flag-table-names-and-shames/

Bangladesh and the HKC: Standards for Ship Recycling

Shipbreaking has always been dirty and dangerous work. For years it was performed under inhospitable working conditions, in countries where legal protection for workers was not strong. Then the Hong Kong Convention (HKC) for the Safe and Environmentally Sound Recycling of Ships became effective in June of 2025. That changed things. Now there is clear international law marking how recycling yards must operate if they want to handle the world’s discarded ships.

Bangladesh is the largest ship-recycling state, with many facilities, and much tonnage recycled into scrap steel and other by-products. The government has drafted new Ship Recycling Rules 2025, to assure that their recycling yards are compliant with both Bangladesh law and with the HKC. And these rules have been receiving some criticism.

The opinion piece linked below, by a prominent Bangladeshi professor and ship-recycling expert, debunks that criticism. It seems that Bangladesh has managed to thread the needle, creating a legal structure that will support compliant shipbreakers, while giving noncompliant facilities a chance and a time window to become compliant. And it’s done in a way that will not allow the noncompliant yards to persist in a rogue fashion.

The law should be welcomed by the shipping community. Bangladesh is a preferred location for shipbreaking because of its ideal geographical setting and better cost profile. A rising tide of scrapping is coming, because of the need to improve environmental characteristics of ships, and an oversupply created by a newbuilding splurge. Bangladesh needs to be included in the roster of decent places to recycle ships.

Published Jan 11, 2026 2:30 PM by Prof. Dr. Ishtiaque Ahmed

https://maritime-executive.com/editorials/op-ed-bangladesh-s-phased-hkc-rollout-makes-sense-if-enforced

Exploring Green Maritime Fuels: CMB.Tech’s Ammonia Plans

We are seeing quite a few announcements of green maritime fuels projects that seem viable. Ammonia is one of those, provided it can be produced in a green fashion. CMB.Tech, one of the maritime shipping and services firms that features sustainable options, has initiated an effort that will begin in January 2026.

CMB.Tech announced it will buy green ammonia from the China Energy Engineering Group (CEEC) Songyuan project, a producer in Jilin province, China. China is a good place to look for green fuels, because of its large and increasing use of solar energy to generate green electricity. Green ammonia production uses lots of electricity.

CMB.Tech will obtain 11 dual-fuel ammonia-powered ships in 2026. It is also planning to operate in the ammonia distribution business, and has obtained an interest in a Chinese ammonia supply chain company, Andefu. The first ammonia for maritime use will be transported to Panjin Port, initially by truck and possibly later by unit train.

Alexander Saverys, CEO of CMB.Tech says: “Today marks a big milestone in our decarbonisation journey. With an investment in the Chinese ammonia supply chain, CMB.Tech will be able to provide green ammonia to its ships.”

His firm is in the forefront of green maritime investment, and is not stopping despite the slowdown of green progress in the international political scene.

Gary Howard, Middle East correspondent

December 16, 2025

https://www.seatrade-maritime.com/alternative-fuels/cmb-tech-invests-in-chinese-green-ammonia