Author Archives: just2bruce

Owner-Operators appear to migrate to large trucking companies

This news service called ‘Loaded and Rolling’ is aimed at the trucking sector. The article here is intriguing. The author has postulated the downward swing of spot trucking rates compared to negotiated or contract rates as the driver for an apparent movement by owner-operator drivers back to large truckers rather than staying on their own. The evidence they cite comes from several large firms’ quarterly reports, which indicate how many drivers and tractors they have.

It’s easy to understand why drivers might want to do this. With fuel prices through the roof, they’d rather let the trucking firm foot that bill. And they can’t get a spot premium anymore for working alone. So signing on reduces their risk. It may also let them take advantage of fleet buying prices for services and for tractors themselves, which are quite pricey right now.

This doesn’t imply anything about the drivers’ status regarding independent contracting. While some drivers might become employees, many will remain independent contractors. It’s only California at present where the status of employee versus contractor is under such scrutiny.

But even there, the economics will favor a move for drivers to larger firms. The costs are everywhere, and with spot prices down it’s harder to earn a premium on piecework. In California, it’s mostly drayage drivers, who work short hauls to and from ports and distribution points, over relatively short distances, that are protesting having to become employees.

I think the protests won’t go on much longer, and won’t spread outside the ports. Port drayage involves short hauls, and when there’s not as much congestion, reasonable turn times. If a driver can do several turns a day and get home at night, being an owner-operator might be ok. But when delays and sudden changes in routing screw up driver schedules and paid time, drivers are not satisfied. Owner-operators have the luxury of parking their truck and working in another industry, such as construction. Employees can’t; but on the other hand, they can get benefits such as health care and pay for wait time at turns, and the trucking firm will be paying the fuel and billing the customer. But the questions about how AB5 will be administrated in California, especially for drayage drivers, can be settled without changing the law.

If more drivers what employee status, due to the economics, that will reduce the noise level also. And it will be easier to make sure trucking firms are not taking advantage of their drivers of whatever type.

July 27, 2022

https://view.em.freightwaves.com/?qs=a242abdc7be6dd0d9cd54d358271b14cdb7ff025e056d774ca4606226e2c3fedd1fb22c3490657b7b570652c8d49550ea94b10ff55e91f75d622816ff82c5e352392a069b88823e2

Trucking industry concerned about SEC’s proposed climate rules

This article is interesting because of the dilemma of small trucking firms. The SEC will soon require disclosure of climate impact by companies, which will include how they ship their goods. There are scope 1, scope 2 and scope 3 emissions. Scope 3 emissions come from the partners used in supply chains. That would mean documenting the emissions from trucking and other cargo movements. It would include also outbound logistics, such as Amazon Prime. Shipper firms would require their suppliers to provide the required information about their emissions. Smaller firms might be at a disadvantage, having to invest in the equipment and people to monitor those emissions and make improvements. Small truck lines think that would offer an unfair advantage to large carriers, because customers would require this information to participate in bidding.

According to the first article by Alyssa Sporrer, large trucking firms support the SEC disclosure rules. That’s because they are already serious about their sustainability efforts, especially environmentally, and it will give them a chance to showcase their efforts.

Sustainability is also in the news in California. CARB, a state agency, has $125 million available for funding for clean off-road equipment, such as that used in ports and freight yards. The program is administered by Calstart, a clean transportation nonprofit. The equipment must be zero-emission, which means electric for the most part. Most of the equipment will be for terminal tractors, on and off-road, refrigeration units, cargo handling equipment, railcar movers and switchers, and airport ground support equipment.

The nice thing about this program is that it does not require firms to retire existing equipment.

The Calstart program prides itself on putting money to work for reduced emissions in places like port communities where excess emissions have caused health problems in the past.

Alyssa Sporrer Thursday, July 14, 2022

Trucking industry concerned about SEC’s proposed climate rules – FreightWaves

Alyssa Sporrer Monday, July 18, 2022

California offers up to $500,000 for purchases of zero-emissions equipment – FreightWaves

Container glut pushes down second-hand prices, but carriers still ordering new

There are now too many containers in the world. And they are cluttering up the ports and yards we need to move containers through. And they cause detention and demurrage charges, because lines won’t move them out of ports.

The global container pool is around 50 million TEU right now. According to Drewry, that is an excess of 6 million TEU. However, Drewry is not too concerned about the excess at present, feeling they can be absorbed if trade picks up. Interestingly, Drewry seems to think that the excess will be absorbed by ‘slower sailing’!

As economics tells us to expect, the price of second-hand containers is falling. However, some carriers, such as Evergreen, continue to order more. Most containers are built in China these days. Three Chinese firms, with state connections, are the primary sources. The problem is that empty used containers cost a lot to return to exporting destinations. They displace paying cargo, forcing ocean carriers to use space to carry them. And especially, with the cost of bunker fuel in the stratosphere, and the need to use very low sulfur fuel in some busy port areas, the transportation cost is high. Ocean carriers have to ‘bundle’ the cost of returns into the one-way cost of the loaded shipment. Either that, or they take a hit by moving the old containers back.

The Seatrade article by Gary Howard has nice graphs showing the average price of 40-foot used containers in Europe, and in China, provided by Container xChange. Again the question of where excess containers will be stored is raised. There haven’t been many answers to that one yet.

By Martina Li in Taiwan 19/07/2022

Container glut pushes down second-hand prices, but carriers still ordering new – The Loadstar
Seatrade logo

Gary Howard | Jul 19, 2022

6m teu oversupply of containers after ‘reactionary’ ordering