Monthly Archives: August 2015

California Court of Appeal Affirms Expense Reimbursement Award to Misclassified Employees

News on misclassified employees in trucking and driving.

Just today! Couriers in San Leandro had to wear badges and were subject to disciplinary rules.

Staffing Industry Analysis Logo

California firm to pay $5 million for misclassifying workers.

Other suits deal with cab drivers forced to work 12 hour shifts 6 days a week without compensation, and  follow a fixed schedule and dress code.

This one is about drayage truckers.

Cal workplace law Bolg

California Court of Appeal Affirms Expense Reimbursement Award to Misclassified Employees | California Workplace Law Blog.

Another very recent case decided against a trucking firm.

CCJ Logo
Calif. Supreme Court rules drivers are employees, not contractors, in misclassification case | Commercial Carrier Journal.

‘Sourcing Hub’ Could Help Create a More Efficient Supply Chain

This story refers to two papers by a University of Illinois professor.  They are worth a look.  He’s saying a ‘sourcing hub’ or information exchange could give large firms more insight into the far reaches of their supply chain for inputs.

‘Sourcing Hub’ Could Help Create a More Efficient Supply Chain – Supply Chain 24/7.

Severe Road Access Limits Following Tianjin Explosion

Risk to supply chains crops up from all kinds of sources. It appears that hazardous materials were being stored in the warehouse complex.  The port has been shut down because of problems with road access, as well as in the harbor.

3PLs Eye Alternatives Due To Severe Road Access Limits Following Tianjin Explosion – Supply Chain 24/7.

There’s no way to plan for this stuff.   However, you can be flexible and have more than one route planned. Or you can place inventory elsewhere on the route to allow you to survive for longer, until the facility gets going again.  So you have to think about risk in terms of alternate means at all times.

And how about supplier qualification?   Should firms look more closely at all the facilities their 3PL chooses to use?  Of course that would help, but it would also be hugely expensive.  And you can bet the 3PL is not doing it, or not doing it the way you would, perhaps.  I wonder if there will be an aftereffect of firms not wanting to go through this port because they feel the Chinese operators are not being policed closely enough for compliance with basic safety and operational rules.