Category Archives: Logistics

Neptune Orient Lines for Sale

More consolidation in container shipping. Must not be very profitable.

Longshore and Shipping News Logo

http://www.longshoreshippingnews.com/2015/07/hapag-lloyd-ipo-nol-sale-reports-fuel-merger-speculation/

Wall Street Journal Logo

Singapore state-investment company Temasek Holdings has put its struggling $1.7 billion container-shipping company, Neptune Orient Lines, up for sale.

Source: Temasek Puts Neptune Orient Lines Up for Sale – WSJ

How Much Did Carrier Alliances Really Contribute to NY-NJ Port Congestion?

This is an older (May 2015) article about the congestion situation at the port of New York/New Jersey and its relation to container shipping alliances.  It’s still true by and large. It is based on a Journal Of Commerce (JOC) article.  Chassis are still to blame in large part at these ports.  I’m sure there’s more to it if you’re inside.  But the point is clear.

Ports and Terminal operators need to address these downstream issues that affect how reliably cargo gets to end customers, and so do the ocean carriers.

Penn Lease Logo

 

 

You might be disappointed to hear that port congestion probably won’t ease as much as you expected despite the agreement between the IWU and the PMA.

Source: If NY-NJ Port Congestion Persists: How Much Did Carrier Alliances Really Contribute? – Penn Intermodal Leasing, Inc

HTA complains: illegal activity during drayage protests

More angst in trucking at Los Angeles and Long Beach.  Are terminals really locking out certain trucking companies who are locked in struggles with employees who are seeking employee and union status?

American Shipper

Source: HTA complains of illegal activity during drayage protests | AS Daily Newsletter | AS Daily | American Shipper

It’s illegal of course, but clearly those drayage firms are not able to offer the same guarantee of service as others who are not experiencing conflict.

The question, from a labor economics standpoint, is whether the terminal actions are somehow putting them in league with the unions.  Remember, earlier when the Clean Trucks program was under discussion, the ports wanted to make everyone a union driver, working for a large company.  That way, the ports thought they could insure the firms would buy new trucks to modernize the fleet– they had sufficient capital, and that would reduce the need for subsidies.    But owner-operators complained bloody murder, the case went to the US Supreme Court, and it was ruled that drivers could not be compelled to be union members or employees.

So terminal operators had better be careful.  It seems to me that the current situation could be interpreted as a sort of tacit collusion with the Teamsters’ union.  Teamsters have a major share of the unionized drivers, and certainly are the biggest labor union player in the debates at these ports.