Category Archives: Sustainability

Upcoming European tsunami

I never heard of the European Union’s taxonomy regulation before.

It’s designed to increase investment in green economic activities, and discourage investment in environmentally sensitive ones. Essentially it codifies the Poseidon Principles into an EU policy.

The term ‘taxonomy’ comes from the intent to classify investments with regard to a number of criteria. In other words, you can’t call an investment ‘green’ unless it speaks to these issues, and meets established criteria.

According to the author, the taxonomy regulation has several main environmental points, as well as social ones:

  • climate change mitigation
  • climate change adaptation
  • sustainable use and protection of water and marine resources
  • transition to a circular economy
  • pollution prevention and control
  • protection and restoration of biodiversity and ecosystems.

The author is a bit concerned that the regulation will give non-European companies an advantage in pursuing shipping investments. And he’s worried about the effect on shipping finance, though he supports the idea of green investment. He just thinks there will be a time of disruption in the financing of maritime activities, with good long-term effects but some short-range dislocation.

That dislocation could affect supply chains in general. For instance, slower steaming will effectively reduce the capacity on main shipping lanes. And the fact that newbuild years are booked two or more years ahead will prevent faster turnover or augmentation of the fleet with cleaner ships.

Nonetheless, adoption will clarify what a green investment means, and will reduce greenwashing— publicizing efforts that are relatively small improvements as major contributions to environmental improvement. And, especially in Europe, it will put down a marker for firms and individuals to reach for.

Dagfinn Lunde April 21, 2022

Upcoming European tsunami – Splash247

Vietnam steel giant Hoa Phat moves into container manufacturing

Others are discovering that they can dump steel by making it into containers. While the Vietnamese steelmaker Hoa Phat mentioned in the article won’t be a large percentage of the demand, it’s significant.

And since more goods are now being exported from Vietnam compared to before the Chinese lockdowns, supplying new containers on the spot may be a better option than moving them from the US and other places.

This means there will be a glut of containers in importing countries. The only option may be to scrap them when they arrive. Ocean carriers and shippers will prefer to buy new containers at the exporting site rather than shift the old empty ones back for more cargo, at present fuel prices and increasing pollution and crew charges.

It’s a real waste to scrap the containers if they are used only once. While steel is recyclable, it’s a torturous road, and we aren’t set up to do it at scale. And a tremendous waste of effort.

All are examples of exogenous charges, as the economists say. They are not factored into the original price of shipping the goods, so they aren’t paid by the shipper. They also aren’t paid by the carrier. They instead erode the general welfare of the communities who have to deal with the empties. It’s a classic scenario in sustainability.

By Martina Li in Taiwan 04/04/2022

Vietnam steel giant Hoa Phat moves into container manufacturing – The Loadstar

US regulator probing China’s role in container shortage

The FMC is looking into Chinese control of containers and equipment to move them. Most containers and chassis are produced in China. So says Carl Bentzel, an FMC commissioner.

China certainly has a large stake in production of both containers and chassis. There are three state-owned firms in China that dominate container production. Even with elevated prices recently, it is still about the same cost to buy a new container in China for the voyage to the US, or to recycle one from the West Coast of the US. Even if you would rather recycle an empty container, the ocean shipping firms can affect that balance by refusing to pick empties up at say Long Beach or Los Angeles, or delay their transit by long enough to cause headaches for those who need them by a certain date.

If empty containers build up in the US, tying up chassis as well, that’s a form of industrial pollution. Having to spend large sums for storage yards rather than getting them back to China is an environmental cost that should not have to be borne by US local governments and citizens.

It’s certainly worth an investigation and perhaps some action by the US government.

John Gallagher, Washington Correspondent Thursday, May 6, 2021

US regulator probing China’s role in container shortage – FreightWaves