Tag Archives: ocean shipping

Carbon Capture for ship engines can be feasible

Bureau Veritas (BV) has produced a feasibility study to estimate the usefulness of carbon capture from marine engines. BV is a multinational risk management insurer and classification society with a strong maritime profile.

The study was conducted by QIYAO EnvironTech (QIYAO), an environmental engineering firm, and Wah Kwong Maritime Transport Holdings, Ltd, a shipping firm.

Wah Kwong provided two vessels from their fleet to be studied and submitted for approval by BV, one smaller and one larger bulk carrier. QIYAO engineered for each ship the specific carbon capture equipment and storage for the liquid CO2 produced. All the requisite drawings and design experiments were performed as though this was to be a real installation. Everything was created that would be required to actually gain approval to operate these ships with the equipment.

While the technical details are interesting, I found the most interesting part was the financial analysis. It showed that for these ships, carbon capture can be moderately positive for cash flow, under a lot of assumptions, of course. Those might or might not be realistic.

But the most interesting thing for me was the value of the liquid CO2, which could be sold at a substantial p[profit based on current market prices. The value of the liquid CO2 captured is more than twice the savings from emission control. That’s what the study found.

Carbon Capture is a technology that is available now. It can be installed on existing ships with a moderate amount of engineering change. Some cargo space is lost to the liquid CO2 tanks that must be on board, but the value of the CO2 outweighs the lost cargo space value.

So it’s a requirement for this technology to develop the supply chain features at ports for handling the liquid CO2 produced, and to develop markets for it. It’s widely used in industry and should find a ready market. That will unlock the real value in making this type of conversion a reality.

The report can be downloaded below.

EU takes action against tankers switching off their AIS

Sam Chambers continues to provide updates on actions related to sanctions due to the Ukraine War.

It’s important to close up loopholes in the sanctions, and one of them is ship-to-ship transfers of Russian oil that avoid visibility through AIS. Some of these transfers are doubtless of oil sold for more than the mandated price cap. It’s a tactic often used by the ‘dark fleet’ which is operating below the radar of recognized and reputable insurance and ship conformance guidelines.

Much has been written about the shadow fleet of tankers. The EU rules will help with enforcement.

While a lot of oil can still be shipped outside these rules, the opprobrium of not being able to land in the EU will force tanker owners and operators to consider more closely how much they want to be outside the ring of sanction-following carriers.

The article states that most of the oil is going to India and China. Those are big economies, and probably won’t change their buying behavior much. But they will not be able to escape knowing when their firms are doing it, and so will the rest of the world.

It’s interesting that the ship-to-ship transfers are occurring off Spain near the Canary Islands, headed mostly to China, and off Greece near Kalamata, headed mostly for India.

It’s unrealistic to expect either flag states or these countries to do anything about it. Both are EU members however, and not allowing the ships to dock in the countries may help out. We’ll see if Spain and Greece follow through on enforcement.

Sam Chambers June 29, 2023

EU takes action against tankers switching off their AIS

Accidents involving shadow fleet cast dark light

This account of the aftermath of the Pablo explosion on May 1 is chilling. Three crew were killed. But now no one is standing up to take charge of disposal of the wreck, much less the other damages it caused. Malaysia is the nation where the ship blew up.

No hull insurers have stepped forward. The ship was flagged in Gabon, not known for strict enforcement of owner obligations. And the ship is operated as a single-ship shell company, based in Marshall Islands. It appears not to have insurance.

It’s clear the vessel was engaged in transporting sanctioned oil. The cleanup will likely never be paid for.

The ship is not yet a ‘wreck’ in the sense of the Nairobi Wreck Removal Convention, which would allow a state (Malaysia) to remove it if it posed a danger to safety of lives, goods, sea traffic, or the environment. The hull might have some salvage value, so a hull insurance firm might be interested. So we have to wait to see what happens.

International rules are set up so that accidents like this will be taken care of, even though extensive and complex litigation may be required. But the countries engaging in sanctioned trade are placing others at risk and expense when something goes wrong.

It’s certainly a negative for Russia, Iran, Venezuela, and other nations who are using these shadow ships to move their oil. Those countries ought to step up and guarantee the costs through their insurers when these maritime accidents happen.

 Sam Chambers June 21, 2023

Exclusive satellite images of wrecked Pablo tanker cast dark light over shadow fleet

Seatrade logo

Marcus Hand | Jun 23, 2023

Panama expels 6.5 million gt of ships linked to Iran, North Korea or sanctions