McKinsey’s take on measuring productivity of R&D. This is a very contentious area, and many have criticized companies for spending too much or too little on R&D. It’s largely based on hypotheticals however, because it is hard to guess what a project is going to contribute. And it’s worse at small innovative enterprises, which are mostly R&D, because there is little info on what the impact of new products will be. The formula would seem to work well at Clayton Christensen’s large stable companies which are simply innovating to please a large group of present and demanding customers, rather than disrupt through spectacular new innovation to gather new customers. Still, it’s good reading and extends the thinking in this area.
Interests
Supply Chain Digest- Lineage Logistics Sues Two Solar Panel Operators over June Fire that Destroyed Las Angeles Warehouse
- Cass Freight Index for August Mostly Positive for Carriers
- The Labor Day Supply Chain 2026 Part 2
- Supply Chain and Logistics Stock Report for Week Ending September 11, 2026
- Tech Trade Group ITI Critical of FCC Ban on Foreign Made Robots
- In Face of Rising Costs and Complexity, Companies Paring SKU Counts
- Humanoid Robot Growth Projected to Triple in 2026
- Supply Chain and Logistics Stock Report for Week Ending September 4, 2026
- Supply Chain by the Numbers for Sept. 4, 2026
- The Labor Day Supply Chain 2026
Port Technology International- An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.
Marine Link- An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.