Tag Archives: tariff avoidance strategies

Chinese ships dropped from U.S. routes

It seems that there is enough extra capacity in container shipping carriers’ fleets so that Chinese-built or Chinese owned ships need not be used on Asia-Pacific routes. Carriers have already announced plans to redeploy Chinese-built ships to other routes. So these shipping lines won’t be paying the US port access fees Trump put into place.

Will anyone be paying them? That’s the question now. The Trump administration’s estimates of the revenue these charges will bring in are way too high. No big money for US shipping improvements.

It’s another example of international ocean carriers and shippers’ immense innovativeness when a barrier to trade is erected. These entrepreneurs will always find a way around the barrier. One example here is ships calling at Canadian ports like Prince Rupert or Mexican ports like Ensenada instead of their US counterparts, avoiding the fees, but still able to provide good service via rail into US customers.

Something similar will happen with US tariffs. Enterprises will find a way around the rules.

That’s been happening since the dawn of navigational history, if not before. The American Revolution was in part about avoidance of requirements imposed by England on the shipment of goods between England and its colonies. The American cargo fleet, run by entrepreneurial sea captains and shipping firms, was an end-around the British shipment rules. Imposing those rules made the Americans mad, and added to the furor about independence.

With the Trump tariffs, too, international commerce will find a way. The result will be much lower tariff fee collections than Trump’s ridiculous projections. It won’t pay for much of anything, let alone trillions. We’re only seeing big numbers now because shippers get caught in the uncertainty; thinking the tariffs are off, they ship the goods, but by the time the goods arrive there’s a tariff again. But once burned, twice shy!

We haven’t seen big declines in Asia-West Coast trade yet, even though container unloadings at the West coast ports are down somewhat. But they are coming. Once firms get serious about minimizing landed cost, shipments could drop another 30% or more. And firms will make sure what they do have to ship is paying lower rates, even if they need to shift the source to another country.

The long-term lesson of history is that Tariffs are a weak tool for boosting a nation’s interests. Most often they wind up just making folks in trade mad, and making them less likely to support the tariffing nation’s interests in any way.

Stuart Chirls Friday, September 12, 2025

https://www.freightwaves.com/news/rates-spin-as-chinese-ships-dropped-from-u-s-routes

Transshipment and the Vietnam Trade Deal

We know that these trade deals aren’t final. But any deal with tariffs will spawn a lot of transshipment activity. The question always is how much value added is put there in the new country?

The goods may be just moved through the country. This creates a tariff avoidance scheme. This happens even if the goods nominally change hands. Sometimes they don’t even get out of the container.

On the other hand, the goods may be more like intermediate supplies for manufacturing, and be assembled into something else before being exported again. These products may qualify for the lower tariff.

All gradations of these extremes are possible. Each individual transfer must be evaluated for transformation in the new country.

The point of the article below is a good one. Underlying it all is a theory of what tariffs hope to accomplish.

If it’s to reshore manufacturing to the US, that probably won’t happen; instead firms will try to run around the tariffs via transshipment. That has happened for hundreds of years, perhaps thousands. There will be a lot of reshoring talk, to stroke Trump’s ego. There will be a few US investments that may or may not last. But the US economy has developed beyond the manufacturing stage. No one truly wants manufacturing jobs— to get workers, wages will need to be so high that it wouldn’t be cost effective to make most stuff here.

The United States became a maritime power in the 1770-1820 time period by deliberately offering shipping to goods that were trying to evade tariffs and other rules set by European countries.

The trade constraints didn’t work in the long run then and won’t now. People will find a way.

Nick Savvides, Europe correspondent

July 3, 2025

https://www.seatrade-maritime.com/containers/transhipment-key-to-us-vietnam-trade-deal