Author Archives: just2bruce

US regulator probing China’s role in container shortage

Posted on March 2, 2022 | 1 comment

The FMC is looking into Chinese control of containers and equipment to move them. Most containers and chassis are produced in China. So says Carl Bentzel, an FMC commissioner.

China certainly has a large stake in production of both containers and chassis. There are three state-owned firms in China that dominate container production. Even with elevated prices recently, it is still about the same cost to buy a new container in China for the voyage to the US, or to recycle one from the West Coast of the US. Even if you would rather recycle an empty container, the ocean shipping firms can affect that balance by refusing to pick empties up at say Long Beach or Los Angeles, or delay their transit by long enough to cause headaches for those who need them by a certain date.

If empty containers build up in the US, tying up chassis as well, that’s a form of industrial pollution. Having to spend large sums for storage yards rather than getting them back to China is an environmental cost that should not have to be borne by US local governments and citizens.

It’s certainly worth an investigation and perhaps some action by the US government.

John Gallagher, Washington Correspondent Thursday, May 6, 2021

US regulator probing China’s role in container shortage – FreightWaves
Like our remarks? We don’t take ads, and don’t just publish press releases. We try to curate articles of significance to maritime trade and logistics both domestic and international. Please donate to our blog!

1 Comment

Posted in Logistics, Ports, Shipping, Supply Chains, Sustainability

Tagged , , , , , ,

Supply chain signals: New-container prices and production finally peak

Posted on February 16, 2022 | 1 comment

There are some interesting statistics here about container production. The graph shows the price of new containers is dropping. Drewry estimates production this year will be somewhere around 4.5 million TEU, 70% of which is 40-foot containers. American companies are also buying 53-foot containers in China and shipping them to the US, where they are legally used on the road.

Price of new containers per TEU. Chart by Triton. Source: American Shipper.

Most containers are built in China. 80% of all new containers are built by three state-supported Chinese factories.

One of the issues no one is addressing is the buildup of ‘container waste’. So many containers are being built now because the need is in China, and it’s costly to transport the empty containers overseas. When the explosion of demand subsides, and we can see that might be starting, there will be less need for empty containers.

So where will the empty containers be? Piling up in the container yards in ports and warehouses in the US. The containers are expensive to ship back to China for reuse, particularly because of chartering costs. Adding ship capacity for empty containers is not a winner for ocean carriers when they can be built in China.

Container waste in certain locales is probably going to be a problem in places in the US where there is an excess of importing. The US does not export enough, even if we somehow increase the agricultural exports in containers, currently around 10% for some crops like soybeans. Those containers have to be stored or sold for houses or storage, or scrapped for the steel. China is ‘dumping’ steel on us again, but in the form of fabricated products— containers.

Now that land transport costs are escalating, it is starting to be costly to transfer empty containers on land in the US. That reduces the possibility of shifting them to an exporter’s location for loading.

Quite a conundrum. The container trade is bumping up against some sustainability issues other than smokestack emissions.

https://www.freightwaves.com/news/supply-chain-signals-new-container-production-and-pricing-finally-peak
https://www.freightwaves.com/news/how-long-does-it-take-to-build-a-shipping-container

1 Comment

Posted in Logistics, Shipping, Supply Chains

Tagged , , , ,

PierPass shelves permanent TMF plan as Long Beach calls for 24/7 supply chains

Posted on February 14, 2022 | 1 comment

The problem with 24/7 operation at ports is that no one wants to pay for it. And that is despite the fact that the costs will probably wind up being added to the import cost and passed on to the shipper and customer.

It seems port executives and supply chain players differ in their view of what’s needed. Terminals and warehouse operators and perhaps even drayage firms don’t think 24-hour service is needed to relieve the current congestion. And the staffing costs of staying open 24/7 would rise, with a lot of potential dead time. It is also hard to find additional trained staff today.

Unions are resisting because they claim the port terminals and other unionized players are not willing to hire more union workers.

And the PierPass is being taken unfair advantage of; apparently some are charging higher fees for using the time slots in the hours outside normal working times. See the second article below, which claims PierPass is only incentivizing adjustments that make them more money, rather than enhancing the flow of goods.

Is it possible for port management to get control of this? It’s doubtful under the current port governance rules.

Perhaps we need even more involvement from the federal government or the FMC to get action.

By Ian Putzger in Toronto 14/02/2022

PierPass shelves permanent TMF plan as Long Beach calls for 24/7 supply chains – The Loadstar

Kim Biggar February 14, 2022

https://splash247.com/fmc-says-non-profit-pierpass-at-los-angeles-and-long-beach-is-making-millions-in-profits/

Like our remarks? We don’t take ads, and don’t just publish press releases. We try to curate articles of significance to maritime trade and logistics both domestic and international. Please donate to our blog!

1 Comment

Posted in Logistics, Ports, Shipping, Supply Chains

Tagged , , , , , , , ,