Tag Archives: ports

Is a New West Coast Container Port Needed? The Coos Bay Dilemma

Coos Bay, OR, USA is pushing for a new West Coast US container port. It will have rail to the port, so that transloading can take place directly to it.

The port planners see a need for another West Coast port of entry for Asian containers that will reach inland via intermodal rail as far as Chicago. The Oregon International Port of Coos Bay has obtained a $25 million grant for pre-planning and pre-construction. The grant will be matched by $25 million from NorthPoint Development, and will be used for environmental review and preliminary engineering activities.

The map below shows why environmental concerns might be considerable. Coos Bay is a small town that’s long been a Mecca for beachgoers and people who love the coastside style of living. A friend moved there from Santa Rosa, in the Bay Area, for that reason.

Google Map of Coos Bay, OR. Red square shows the approximate location of the new container port.

You can see on the map that ingress is through a small strait, with a narrow bay running northward to the Coos River. The port will be on the barrier island, just below another industrial site, a sawmill, according to the planning material. Its projected capacity will be 2 million TEU, or one million forty-foot containers per year.

That’s quite a few. It’ s only a bit smaller than the Port of Oakland, in CA, which runs about 2.5 million TEU per year. And it dwarfs the container traffic at the Port of Portland. However, Portland specializes more in automobiles, and grain and minerals bulk. If the port runs at 60% capacity, a reasonable figure for international container ports, that would be 1.2 million TEU per year, or 500,000 forty-foot units.

It’s not a bad idea, geopolitically, to have another West Coast port for containers. It’s a relief valve for the big California ports, which are subject to periodic longshore union strikes and other potential disruptions. Those ports are also major sources of pollution.

The all-rail connection should also make air pollution less of a problem. Perhaps the port can prevent local drayage from causing mammoth traffic and air problems in this pristine area.

Notice Charleston Marine Life Center at the entrance to the strait, a branch of the University of Oregon. Below is a photo of a Dungeness Crab, a local resident; delicious and protected from overfishing. Dredging, which the plan says is necessary, may threaten marine species nearby.

Boxes will move via a short line, Coos Bay Rail Line, owned by the port. It runs north from the peninsula about 137 mi, terminating near Eugene OR at the Union Pacific line. That provides access by rail to all of the central US. And if the UP/NS merger comes to pass, it will provide a single transfer access even to the Northeast US and even Europe. That provides access by rail to all of the central US. And if the UP/NS merger comes to pass, it will provide a single transfer access even to the Northeast US and even Europe.

It’s not clear that more capacity is needed on the West Coast of the US, particularly if interntional maritime trade is resetting and the Asia-US container movements are declining.

Evidently East Coast container traffic is also in decline.

We see a report today of Charleston, on the US East coast, shutting down a 700,000 TEU capacity terminal, Leatherman, because of low demand. It only processed 75,455 containers so far this year. The final capacity of Leathrman Terminal when built out is planned to be 2.4 million TEU. A second berth construction project is being continued. The planned rail yard adjacent to Leatherman, a $690 million project, is being suspended.

freigntwaves logo

Trains.com Staff Wednesday, June 24, 2026

https://www.freightwaves.com/news/oregon-port-oks-federal-rail-grant-agreement-for-multimodal-project

Jun 25, 2026 4:59 PM by The Maritime Executive

https://maritime-executive.com/article/charleston-pauses-operations-at-new-terminal-citing-low-volume-high-costs

China-France Green Corridors: A New Blueprint for Maritime Decarbonization

Green corridors are a meaningful approach to emissions reduction for shipping. They coordinate the various factors required to make emissions reductions possible. Designating a green corridor will ensure that emissions-reducing fuels will be available in sufficient quantity for the ships calling, and the infrastructure for production and delivery is there. On-shore power will also be available for ships, so they do not need to operate engines just to provide power for the ship support. And in the port, cargo handling equipment can also be designed with cleaner emissions. Properly done, drayage functions will also operate with cleaner power.

It’s great to see a new green corridor connecting China and France. The ports involved are both important stops. And we can anticipate more trade between the EU and
China because of the American tariff hoopla.

Michele Labrut,Americas Correspondent

February 6, 2026

https://www.seatrade-maritime.com/ports-logistics/first-green-shipping-corridor-between-france-and-china

Green Corridors Hit ‘Realization’ Stage: The Zero-Emission Hurdle

The Getting to Zero Coalition and the Global Maritime Forum have issued a new report At a Crossroads: Annual Progress Report on Green Shipping Corridors 2025. Green shipping corridors are a very impactful way of moving toward zero emissions in the maritime area. They can coordinate many players by providing a specific attainable goal— zero emissions on a specific route for specific ship types. These corridors are independent of efforts by the EU to create incentives and penalties for carbon emissions and reductions, and of efforts by the International Maritime Organization (IMO) to reach a consensus on rules and measures for intrnational ocean shipping. Many times they are organized by specific ports and specific ocean carriers. Often they try to focus efforts on supply chains for specific fuels at those ports.

I think these efforts are extremely important. They can show how to provide reasonably priced fuel supply chains and how to coordinate investors, ocean shipping players, and financial institutions as well as governments. These experiments need to be tried.

The report has been published since 2022, effectively the beginning of the green shipping corridors movement. Steady gains have been made, and today there are 84 initiatives catalogued, with 305 stakeholders. 25 more initiatives have been recorded.

Source: Annual Progress Report on Green Shipping Corridors, 2025.

An interesting section discussed progress at the four corridors that have reached the highest stage in the journey: the Realization stage. Three of them are short-sea routes in Europe. The longest runs bulkers from Australia to China and other Far East ports.

  • Stockholm-Turku ferry, Finland to Sweden, biomethane;
  • Vaasa-Umeå ferry, Finland to Sweden, biomethane;
  • Australia-East Asia bulk carriers, iron ore, ammonia;
  • Oslo-Rotterdam container ships, hydrogen.

I found it interesting that the three short routes fund the difference between green and dirty fuels by entering pooling agreements to sell credits to other shipping lines, under the EU policies. The long ammonia route alone is driven by private firms involved in the trade, to help them meet dramatically lower emissions goals, with fuel costs not funded but expected to drop to a reasonable level as the infrastructure is built out. China, Korea, and Japan all have goals for reduced emissions from shipping which the iron ore route will help with.

Four recommendations emerge from the report’s assessment of the green corridor potential and progress.

  • Pursuing strategies to break the inertia and keep the momentum;
  • Connecting cargo owner willingness to pay to the corridors;
  • Taking an active stance at the IMO;
  • Tapping into or replicating emerging national policy instruments.

Significant issues for now are:

  • Delay of the IMO Net-Zero framework; participants may wait for more clarity.
  • Will the cargo owner be willing to pay for green shipping on the corridor? The evidence so far is not good.
  • Influencing public policies to support investment and regulation.
  • Staying focused on truly green corridors that deploy zero-emission assets rather than fossil fuels, do it early, and iron out the kinks.

This chart shows the right and wrong approaches:

Source: Annual Progress Report on Green Shipping Corridors, 2025, page 25

The study is available in PDF at this link. It contains an Appendix listing all the current Green Corridors in the portfolio at present.

I was very happy to read this summary of the state of green corridor adoption. Keeping this movement going will play an important part in maritime decarbonization.

Gary Howard, Middle East correspondent November 27, 2025

https://www.seatrade-maritime.com/green-shipping/first-four-green-corridors-hit-realisation-stage