Category Archives: maritime

ILA stops negotiations with USMX

The labor deal between US East and Gulf Coast ports and the International Longshoreman’s Association (ILA) may be unraveling. The current agreement expires at the end of September. It was a six-year deal.

The major issue at present is an Auto Gate system Maersk and APM Terminals are using that processes trucks autonomously, with no ILA labor. The union claims this directly contradicts what was agreed in the last union contract.

Automation and protection of ILA jobs have for years now been a bone of contention between the union and the alliance of container carriers, direct employers, and port associations that serve US ports, which is called the United States Maritime Alliance (USMX). The same was true on the West Coast, when the recent strike was averted by a new contract with the Pacific Maritime Association.

There’s no easy way to find resolution. Automation reduces jobs for longshoremen, though it creates support jobs, for which most union longshoremen are not qualified. And retraining these longshoremen may be difficult, even if some way could be found to fund it. Each side thinks the other ought to pay for the retraining. And in the short run, there will still be a workforce reduction.

The September 30, 2024 expiration date looks like it may not be met; however both sides have usually agreed to continue work as usual while still negotiating. However, openly violating terms of the contract, especially without full discussion with the union, is a good way to get their dander up, and prolong the negotiations.

Best to practice transparency and full disclosure.

Logistics Management logo

By Jeff Berman June 10, 2024

https://www.logisticsmgmt.com/article/ila_stops_negotiations_with_usmx_with_deal_set_to_expire_at_the_end_of_september

Accidents involving shadow fleet cast dark light

This account of the aftermath of the Pablo explosion on May 1 is chilling. Three crew were killed. But now no one is standing up to take charge of disposal of the wreck, much less the other damages it caused. Malaysia is the nation where the ship blew up.

No hull insurers have stepped forward. The ship was flagged in Gabon, not known for strict enforcement of owner obligations. And the ship is operated as a single-ship shell company, based in Marshall Islands. It appears not to have insurance.

It’s clear the vessel was engaged in transporting sanctioned oil. The cleanup will likely never be paid for.

The ship is not yet a ‘wreck’ in the sense of the Nairobi Wreck Removal Convention, which would allow a state (Malaysia) to remove it if it posed a danger to safety of lives, goods, sea traffic, or the environment. The hull might have some salvage value, so a hull insurance firm might be interested. So we have to wait to see what happens.

International rules are set up so that accidents like this will be taken care of, even though extensive and complex litigation may be required. But the countries engaging in sanctioned trade are placing others at risk and expense when something goes wrong.

It’s certainly a negative for Russia, Iran, Venezuela, and other nations who are using these shadow ships to move their oil. Those countries ought to step up and guarantee the costs through their insurers when these maritime accidents happen.

 Sam Chambers June 21, 2023

Exclusive satellite images of wrecked Pablo tanker cast dark light over shadow fleet

Seatrade logo

Marcus Hand | Jun 23, 2023

Panama expels 6.5 million gt of ships linked to Iran, North Korea or sanctions