Category Archives: Rail

Labor disruption coming for supply chains

Now is the time for labor unions to press ports and railways for new benefits for workers. There is a perfect storm of labor stoppages about to take place.

Thursday (that’s two days from this writing) the Teamsters Canada union (TCRC) expects to strike the CPKC railroad, one of the two largest in Canada. CPKC is also a large US and Mexico railway, and we’ve yet to see if US unions will honor a Canadian strike. The Canadian National (CN) rail line has blocked the strike by giving a lockout notice to the union. So there’s a high likelihood that most Canadian rail shipments will be shut down later this week.

The TCRC has turned down offers made in January, April and May. The labor agreements with the rails expired at the end of 2023, and the workers are working under the old contract. There have also been some rules changes by the government to reduce fatigue, that are not accounted for in the contracts. In fact, the union claims the rails want to ‘gut the collective agreement of all safety-critical fatigue provisions’. That may be hyperbole, but it’s indicative of the bitterness of disagreement.

The Teamsters represent about 10,000 workers. The Labor Minister has not issued an order for binding arbitration, so it’s likely there will be stoppages.

The cessation of rail movements means there are likely to be major disruptions at ports, where rail takes goods into the interior of Canada and also to the US. The rails are already announcing embargos which mean that they will not accept new shipments in certain areas because of expected port congestion.

The Port of Vancouver has already ordered ships on their way there to slow-steam because they fear they will not be able to move cargo out or into the port.

To top off the labor confusion, the US East Coast Ports are engaged in negotiations with the International Longshoremens Association (ILA), the major union representing 85,000 members. The ILA has indicated that October 1 will begin a strike if a new contract is not agreed. There does not seem to be a clear path to agreement.

Shippers and Ocean Carriers are already preparing. Cargo is shifting to the West Coast US Ports, where an agreement was completed last year. I expect the East Coast ILA members expect similar if not better contracts, because East Coast ports have been prospering for the last couple of years. Their first glitch was when the Panama Canal reduced its traffic due to an extended drought. Traffic started shifting to the West Coast then. Now the Panama Canal is near its former levels, and traffic is rising again. The East Coast Ports do not need a strike right now.

But that’s exactly why the unions are playing hardball.

We’ll see how it plays out.

FreightWaves Staff· Monday, August 19, 2024

Teamsters Canada Rail Conference delivers strike notice to CPKC; CN delivers lockout notice

By Charlotte Goldstone 20/08/2024

Congestion ‘rearing its disruptive and costly head’ as Canada rail strike looms

UPDATE: Rail contract talks continuing; Vancouver port acts ahead of possible stoppage

Seatrade logo

Nick Savvides | Aug 16, 2024

US East Coast port strike the next spanner in supply chains

By David Ljunggren August 19, 20249:10 AM MST Updated a day ago

Explainer: Why Canada is on the verge of an unprecedented rail labor stoppage

Mexico-to-US intermodal rail service

DP World, the international port container terminal operator, is beginning a new rail service from Mexico to the US for automobiles. It will use 53-foot containers to move the cars by truck or rail. That makes the containers compatible with the standard size container used in the US and Mexico as well, rather than the 40-foot ocean containers. That eliminates a need to transload for US road transport.

It’s a good idea. Large quantities of cars are made in Mexico for the US market. The business is growing, because some automotive components made in China face trade barriers when ocean shipped directly to the US.

Intermodal transport by rail over long distances will reduce emissions considerably. A properly engineered service could compete in travel time with road haulage to a distribution point.

Railroads have notorious problems with reliability of service; they have trouble predicting when arrival may occur. According to rail experts, this is largely due to delays that occur in switching yards, which can be unpredictable in length. And when one stopover in a yard is delayed so the next outbound train is missed, days can be added to transit times.

However, auto transport in containers like this has advantages.

First, at the destinations, cargo owners have some buffer storage, so delayed delivery is seldom critical to business.

Second, the container cars can be mixed and matched on trains, so if some are ready, they can make the train for the next leg; others can wait for the next train. All the containers in the original train needn’t go together. My rail expert thinks this ability to make shorter trains is key to making rail transport more reliable and yard performance more efficient.

Third, intermodal transport of containers has been shown to reduce emissions over individual container transport by truck. That’s important for many shippers today, due to public companies’ need to report Scope 3 emissions.

Finally, there’s a growing demand for car transport from Mexico. The country is proving to be a dependable place to locate auto factories, with adequate labor supply and manufacturing knowledge. There should be plenty of business for DP World.

Noi Mahoney Tuesday, May 21, 2024

https://www.freightwaves.com/news/dp-world-launches-mexico-to-us-intermodal-rail-service

Boardroom battle at Norfolk Southern heats up

Ancora Advisors (some info here), an activist hedge fund with over 300 high-wealth customers, is suggesting 7 new board members for the Class I rail Norfolk Southern (NS). You may remember NS as the victim of the giant train wreck in New Palestine, OH, which released a lot of fumes; it has been criticized for having too few workers to perform required preventative inspections. Ancora also has suggestions for a new COO who is a disciple of Hunter Harrison, who implemented precision scheduled railroading.

Regulators also are suspicious of the idea. They fear that Ancora is more interested in short-term profit and will drive railroad operations back into a philosophy of cost savings rather than a culture of safety.

I looked a bit at the Ancora staff and CEO. I don’t see folks who seem like rabid cost-cutters. I do see people who might feel that NS’s current management has not done enough to address the operational problems that have recently come up, both in the safety line and in operational effectiveness in meeting customer requirements.

That too is a concern of regulators, though it’s a bit muted. Reciprocal switching is also being discussed now, and the rails are not enthusiastic about a change towards this practice, even though it would be consistent with a common carrier’s role, and would increase competition for customers.

We will watch closely to see how the boardroom battle continues.

By Ian Putzger in Toronto  28/02/2024

Boardroom battle at Norfolk Southern heats up as rail regulators weigh in