Category Archives: Shipping

Quote

Asia-Europe rollovers are back

It appears that ocean carriers are again playing fast and loose with delivery dates for cargo.  There’s a telling remark by an NVOCC source: “You might be able to book at that rate, but you have absolutely no idea when you are going to get the boxes shipped.”

Carriers still have not got the message that most shippers want their cargo when it was promised.  There might be a few that can stand a long delay, but the trend in inventory over the last 20 years has been toward rightsizing inventory by factoring in its logistics.  You can’t do that well if there is substantial variation in lead times. The formula for overall variation of inventory— measured by variance (square of standard deviation)— weights variance of lead time by the demand, but variance of demand by the lead time.

Looking at the formula, a mathematical truth deducible simply from the definition of variance and the assumption of independence of demand and lead time distributions, shows that often lead time variation has an outsized effect.

Ocean carriers can’t control the demand, but they can control the lead time. But it seems that they ought to spend more time thinking about how to help keep the customer’s overall variation low, rather than only dealing with what they alone can control.

Time to get on the supply chain thinking boat!  It left the dock years ago!

logo

By 

 via Asia-Europe carriers leave boxes on quays as they eye better-paid cargo – The Loadstar

Quote

Are carriers boosting low-sulphur fuel surcharges to make up for low rates?

This story is a follow up to one I did a couple of weeks ago.  Fuel surcharges are varying wildly. A consultant found that there’s a wide disparity, the rate rationale is not very transparent, and rates vary even within alliances.   Conditions like this lead to confusion and annoyance among customers, especially smaller shippers.  I expect 3PLs will also be annoyed, but they will be figuring out how to explain the surcharges or where to hide them in their reselling agreements.  It doesn’t make for great credibility among the ocean carriers.

 

logovia Are carriers boosting low-sulphur fuel surcharges to make up for low rates? – The Loadstar

Quote

ITF Study on shipping alliances makes EC exemption decision ‘puzzling’

Why did the EU decide to extend shipping alliances’ rights?  This article in the Loadstar points to a short piece on Linked in calling attention to a study by Olaf Merk (and others) critiquing alliances and what they have done to the ocean shipping and port industries.

The study points out alliances were useful in the distant past, but today they are serving to consolidate ocean shipping, reduce offers and most every service, and they also put great pressure on ports to engage in competition on facilities, a costly endeavor that results in over-allocation of capital for the use of few lines.

I’ve attached the Merk etal. article below. He’s an eminent port and maritime economist, and what he writes should be taken seriously.

logo

By Alex Lennane 22/11/2019

 

via Study on shipping alliances makes EC exemption decision ‘puzzling’ – The Loadstar

The Impact of Alliances on Container Shipping