Interests
Supply Chain Digest- Trip Report on Gartner Supply Chain Symposium 2026
- Supply Chain by the Numbers for May 15, 2026
- Orders for Industrial Robots in North America were Flat in Q1, According to A3
- US Chamber of Commerce Warns of Growing Dependence on China Supply Chains
- Supply Chain and Logistics Stock Report for May 8, 2025
- Supply Chain by the Numbers for May 8, 2026
- Amazon Sends a Shot across the Bow of Parcel and Freight Carriers and 3PLs with Launch of New Supply Chain Services Unit
- Amazon has Blowout Q1
- Insource What Matters. Lesson from Toyota for Lean Practitioners in the Age of AI
- US PMI Shows Manufacturing Growth for the Fourth Consecutive Month in April
Port Technology International- APMT Apapa rolls out 4G LTE network
- APMT Pipavav unveils expansion project
- COSCO positive despite plummeting revenue
- Hutchison Ports and Egyptian Navy to build new container terminal
- Kalmar to supply Cambodian terminal with RTGs
- Europe leads the way as shipping steps up green tech research
- ABB and Kongsberg to work towards common data vessel infrastructure
- PSA Marine launches carbon cutting digital solution
- Port of Riga upgrades container handling fleet
- Mason Mega Rail project reaches new milestone
Marine Link- ESAB Awards $5,000 Welding Grant to Two Texas High Schools
- Oil Prices Rise More Than 3% As US-Iran Talks Dent Hopes of Peace
- Greek-Operated Tanker Crosses Strait of Hormuz
- Coast Guard Seizes Sailing Vessel During Offshore Interdiction Operation
- ScioSense Launches UFC23 Ultrasonic Flow Converter for High-Precision, Ultra-Low-Power Smart Metering
- Samsung Heavy Industries Receives AIP Certificate for Floating Data Center from ABS
- Solstad’s Arbitration Win Unlocks $14.5M Payment for its Largest Vessel
- Caturus Takes FID on Commonwealth LNG Project in Louisiana
- Oil Prices Rise Amid Fears of Ship Attacks and Seizures
- Somali Piracy on the Rise
Category Archives: Uncategorized
BNSF, Port of Los Angeles appeal court decision that rejects proposed $500m rail yard | AS Daily Newsletter | AS Daily | American Shipper
Posted in Uncategorized
Supply Chain News: Inventory Performance 2016
Dan Gilmore of Supply Chain digest again does the math for us on US inventory measures. It seems that companies are still expanding inventory.
In the stores, stuff should not be out all the time, or a lot less, than a couple of years ago. Do you notice it? I think I do.
Dan discusses the pros and cons of the measures, and sometimes makes some corrections, good thinking on his part. We can feel free to critique his choices, but his motivation is a better understanding of how supply chains are handling inventory, and that is a noble objective.
Data Shows US Company Inventories Continue to Rise
Posted in Uncategorized
In-Store Fulfillment is No Defense Against Amazon
A very good article from MIT details why having workers pick customer orders for them for in-store delivery of online orders is a flawed strategy.
I can see why by putting my last visit to CVS in that context. We went to get some cotton balls, peroxide, and hair spray. Assume we had ordered it online. And pretend I’m not me, but instead a store employee picking the order. I go to the first aid section; there are six different kinds of cotton balls, and it isn’t possible to tell them apart from the labeling on the packages. Some are clearly intended to be identical, but they are in different packaging and imprints, and the different sizes are all mixed up. And they are stored in two different places in the store! I wander around for five minutes checking them out, then ask a clerk, who tells me about the two stock points. After another five minutes I have my package.
Next I look for the peroxide. There are two brands, one a CVS private label, and other a named brand. The private label one is nominally cheaper, but the name brand one is almost the same price. But… the named brand one can be bought cheaper with an in-store coupon, which cannot be used for online. So I pick the private label brand.
Finally the hair spray. There are myriad hair spray products but they are stored using vendor managed inventory in manufacturer specific displays. The one ordered is mixed in with ten different varieties all with similar labeling but minor characteristic differences. On the way there I find one that is very similar to the one I ordered, and would be suitable, but is half price on an in store special. If I were me, I would buy it now. but I am picking on behalf of the customer. Do I pick the cheaper one, and tell the customer that this one would be just as good and is half price? Do I continue to get the one she ordered without any disclosure of a better priced item that might work? Do I have any disclosure requirement either online or in the store?
Done picking, I go to checkout counter (or kiosk) to ring up and deposit my items in the private locker, where it waits for me as customer. I have spent fifteen minutes picking; that lets me pick about 32 orders in a shift of 8 hours (no breaks). If the average order is $30, I have abetted about $960 of business. Assuming half is operating margin, about $480 is left. My salary at $15 an hour (minimum wage) is $120, If I get benefits of 33% (typical in CA) that goes to $160. There is $320 left be credited against other costs and take my profit. Can I cover all my transportation, stocking, building expenses, and overhead etc with this much? If I need 5% profit at the store level, that’s $48 on its own, leaving less than $300 out of $960. That’s about 31.25%
(EBITDA for CVS, quarter ending 3/31/2016 was $2,176m and total revenue was $43,215m, or 5.03%; from Yahoo finance figures we cannot disentangle retail from the Caremark drug insurance business; net income was $1,147m or about half the EBITDA).
Operating expenses are currently about 2/3 of gross profit (4568m/6744m, source CVS Interactive analyst center ) , leaving 33%. My omnichannel experience would be a drag on the store. I think that’s the point of the MIT article.
Somehow retailers are going to have to discover how the omnichannel operation can be streamlined in the store to reduce expenses considerably. It’s certainly possible with improved technology, willing trained workers, and close attention to operations changes to support it. but it’s going to be a long fight, with many pitfalls along the way.
Comments Off on In-Store Fulfillment is No Defense Against Amazon
Posted in Investing, Labor Economics, Logistics, Service Management, Strategy, Supply Chains, Uncategorized
Tagged labor economics, Logistics, omnichannel, retail, supply chains
