Insiders say Flock Freight is a ‘toxic dumpster fire’

I don’t usually comment on shenanigans at specific firms. But here’s the case of a logistics unicorn, a startup with a valuation of over $1 billion, that so fits the pattern of many startups from my experience in Silicon Valley in the frantic 80’s and 90’s. Burning through cash like there’s no tomorrow. Beating down employees. Inadequate software for doing a large amount of business. A CEO who’s over the top, demanding performance and ridiculing or shunning those who don’t perform to his (most of them are men!) exalted standard based on false assumptions.

The idea behind Flock Logistics is a decent one. Try to pool smaller shipments that normally would need to travel as LTL cargo into a single trailer, and carry it as FTL cargo. How you load and unload it and how you schedule the trips is a complicated question, and software could play a big role. But the essential problem is one of the pooling concept. Can you put together enough small cargoes with similar destination from similar starting points and then meet the time schedules of all the shippers and receivers, with a single truck load? It’s a problem you face one load at a time, and you have to solve it to satisfy multiple customers for each truckload.

It’s not surprising that they have troubles with customer service. It’s not surprising that they can’t sell enough cargoes to fill a truck most of the time, so to meet commitments they have to ‘ship air’. It’s a hard problem to crack. And yelling at the sales folks won’t create business.

And it’s not surprising that the CEO would be a dingbat. Particularly in software, I met one of these a week in Silicon Valley. They think they are Steve Jobs, or Bill Gates (both with reputations like that), or more up to date, Elon Musk, and their idea is great and executable because they found some investors willing to throw millions if not billions at them. But very few have what it takes to make a great company out of a startup.

The employees are the ones who suffer. They have to have thick skins to submit to being beaten up for goals actually not feasible, and they are the ones who have to speak with disgruntled customers and try to preserve their personal reputation along with that of the firm. Especially these days after COVID, employees are much less likely to take that kind of abuse; working conditions are part of their package. They’d be gone even if they didn’t get laid off.

One startup CEO I can think of who seems to have succeeded is Ryan Petersen of Flexport. Despite the billions Flexport has been given, they seem to be able to keep meeting customers’ needs in logistics. And Ryan was smart enough to step away when the firm became so big and needed to be sustainable; I guess he didn’t see it as his mission to run that big a firm with such intense customer service needs.

The story below tells it all. Don’t bet on Flock Logistics being around long.

Clarissa Hawes·Friday, April 21, 2023

Insiders say Flock Freight is a ‘toxic dumpster fire’ with only months of cash left – FreightWaves

Shippers and carriers caught up in new D&D legal battles

There’s no end to the confusion surrounding Detention and Demurrage (D&D) charges for ocean container movements landside. This recital of some recent lawsuits shows that firms are not passing on information that would allow actual determination of accurate D&D charges.

Tthe FMC is starting to crack down on billing that isn’t complete, but some firms may not comply right away, and of course there are older cases which did not come under the recent rule.

The recourse is the courts, and that’s what’s happening now. The supply chain ‘partners’ in the move are handing off responsibility one to another. The Hapag-Lloyd story, involving a forwarder ME Dey, their haulier New Age Logistics, CSX Rail, and Hapag, is just such a case. One claim being made is that the haulier asked to use their chassis to haul the containers to avoid the D&D charges; but they were told that they could not do that, because the containers “belonged to the steamship line”. This kind of nonsensical behavior is not cooperation, and does not facilitate good supply chain relations. Expect more lawsuits!

By Nick Savvides 25/04/2023

Shippers and carriers caught up in new D&D legal battles – The Loadstar

UMAS report details green priorities for shipping

UMAS is an acronym for University Maritime Advisory Service, a commercial advisory service, or consulting firm, focusing on the maritime segment. It makes use of the University College London shipping team as subject matter experts, and takes on relevant projects for the maritime industry.

Recently they’ve released a report entitled A Strategy for the Transition to Zero-Emission Shipping, which tries to spell out ways that a pathway to a 1.5 degree Centigrade increase could be found. It’s an interesting study because it deals with not only the science-based facts about fuels and propulsion systems, and ship designs, but also with the organizational, regulatory, private investment, and geopolitical aspects of a transformation.

The study outlines three scenarios for a fuel transition away from fossil fuels. These are:

  • A spread from a strong first-mover country to others
  • Independent spread from several countries
  • Global actions (such as the IMO) to drive international spread.

The report goes on to identify levers for change in each scenario, covering three phases of the transition to 1.5 degrees C. The phases are Emergence, Diffusion, and Reconfiguration. They are captured in Figure 19, on page 67 of the report. Here you can see the importance of developing new technologies and investing to expand deployment in the first two phases.

The question they address is how to get all the factors necessary to work for the change in each phase. Especially important are the Energence and Diffusion phases, partly because that’s where we are now, and partly because success there largely determines how we reach the final phase.

The report sees a place for all three scenarios in the effort. It’s quite clear about how companies, governments of states, and international organizations could participate and make the transition easier.

One interesting point is the attention paid to constructing green corridors between different ports, both domestic routes and international ones. The green corridor movement is a powerful driver, and there are now lots of examples starting to appear; they are outlined in the report. The analysis is quite detailed, with actual corridor possibilities outlined, and key national players identified. Experience with the difficulties of establishing them will be important to make the process easier in the future.

The report is also positive about the IMO and its role, while acknowledging some of the difficulties relying on it introduces.

It’s quite an exceptional work, and I recommend reading it. I wish I’d been part of it!

You can read the report pdf here:

Sam Chambers April 5, 2023

UMAS report details green priorities for shipping this decade – Splash247

 Sam Chambers April 20, 2023

IMO study makes the case for more ambitious green targets