Midwest soybean farmers to help pay for Pacific Northwest export terminal; rail service is risky for harvest this year.

Soybean exports are one of the US major sources of export revenue. China is the biggest consumer of soybeans that are exported, about half the US crop. The US competes with Brazil for the Far East soybean market.

Most soybeans to China are for pig feed. However, they can be used to produce biofuel as well.

The new port, in Aberdeen, WA, near Seattle and Tacoma, will export soybean meal. Six state Soybean Associations will chip in to cover the cost, along with the Soy Transportation Coalition. They’ll contribute $900K of the cost.

The terminal will have rail service, involving an interchange between the BNSF and UP main lines, which are predominant in service to Midwest farmers and their elevators, and the Puget Sound and Pacific line, which goes right to the port.

Like the agricultural shipping terminal near Oakland, CA, this facility ought to be of great value in exporting soybean products.

Elsewhere, corn farmers in the US Midwest are worried that railroad inefficiency and poor reliability will prevent grain exports from being shipped as the harvest comes on. A good summary of the situation is in the second article.

Many elevators rely on rail transport to get their grain to a port for export. Some can use barges down the Mississippi, but others, in locations more than 200 mi. from a Mississippi port, use rail at local sidings at elevators. Railroads will need to up their game to support the US export market for agricultural products.

Joanna Marsh Thursday, September 1, 2022

Midwest soybean farmers to help pay for Pacific Northwest export terminal – FreightWaves

 Joanna Marsh Friday, September 2, 2022

Grain shippers eye hiccups on rail network

Maersk faces $180m claim for US shipper losses in legal row over contract

A shipper consortium from New York claims Maersk failed to provide space the consortium had contracted for, and instead sold the space to others at higher spot prices. So the consortium members had to procure their slots on the spot market too.

The consortium, U Shippers Group, claims Maersk also offered their space to another shipping consortium, in violation of the contract. U Shippers believes the damage is over $180 million.

The contract with U Shippers had a volume incentive3 program (VIP), based on the number of containers shipped. Because space was not provided, U Shippers did not get credit for payments they would have received had the space been available.

It’s a nasty dispute. I suspect that this was a result of a local office of Maersk taking some liberties. The picture may not be totally clear, either; perhaps some of the shipments were a little iffy.

It will be interesting to follow up and see the FMC decision in the case. It won’t be settled for over 6 months.

By Nick Savvides 02/09/2022

Maersk faces $180m claim for US shipper losses in legal row over contract – The Loadstar

How will autonomous trucks handle blowouts?

This article discusses the issues surrounding blowouts, and how autonomous trucks might handle the problem. Blowouts occur fairly frequently, though tire manufacturers are making better tires as time goes by. Drivers can usually use their ‘feel’ of the truck to navigate to a safe place to take care of the tire. How would an autonomous truck do it.

The article notes that this problem is one of the top five remaining problems for autonomous navigation.

Blowouts are not a major source of highway deaths. But they occur frequently. All the major tire manufacturers are working on means to control them. Sensors are the main approach. Progress in this area will benefit both driverless and people-driven trucks.

Alan Adler Monday, April 4, 2022

How will autonomous trucks handle blowouts? – FreightWaves