Kenyan driver rumors plague Werner Trucking

Nebraska, the home state of Werner, has made a deal with Kenya to get workers from there. The reason given is to make more truck drivers available.

Werner got caught up in the flak because they hosted a meeting between the Nebraska Secretary of State and a Kenyan delegation. The topic was supposedly an economic cooperation deal. But both Kenyan and Nebraska officials have said that acquiring Kenyan truck drivers was one of the objectives.

Werner managment claimed on X that they have no plans to hire Kenyan drivers and are not part of the deal. But other Nebraska trucking firms have said they would be interested.

I’ve met Derek Leathers, CEO of Werner, and if he says Werner will not hire Kenyan drivers, I believe him.

But my question is, where does Nebraska get off making arrangements to bring foreign workers into the US? The oft-repeated policy of the US government is to deport foreign workers, and the rationale is that they take jobs from Americans. Why are these workers an exception?

Now I support allowing immigration; we have an aging workforce, we are becoming a nation of retired people. Our younger generations tend to want jobs that offer a better lifestyle than factory or repetitive jobs. Truck driving doesn’t offer any lifestyle advantages for most folks, and many of our trucking firms have often routinely taken advantage of drivers.

But truck driving is essential to our economy and our businesses. So we need drivers, just as we need agricultural workers, construction workers, landscapers, and those who can perform other hard jobs. Immigrant workers pay taxes and spend cash in American businesses. It’s good for all.

John Kingston Wednesday, September 10, 2025

https://www.freightwaves.com/news/werner-faces-social-media-storm-over-kenyan-driver-rumors

The Bottleneck in Green Fuel Supply for Shipping Industry

DNV, a major classification service for the maritime industry (it stands for Det Norske Veritas), is reporting that accounting for newbuilds that can burn alternate green(er) fuels, the bottleneck will be the supply of these fuels for maritime use.

It calls the phenomenon a “fuel transition tipping point”. It’s a strong demand signal for fuel producers. The graph shows the exponentially rising number of alternative fuel ships in the fleet, and adds the order book for the future. Methanol seems to be increasing quickly.

The infrastructure just isn’t there yet, and bunker operators and fuel producers need to step up their investments.

Green corridors are one approach that is gaining traction. In this scenario, several partners join forces with ports, fuel producers and bunker operators to make sure the infrastructure is there for fueling with green fuels on the route, usually point-to-point. Maersk has been a leader in this effort. Others are getting on board.

You can read the DNV maritime forecast to 2050 report here.

Sam Chambers September 11, 2025

https://splash247.com/shippings-fuel-transition-hits-a-supply-side-reality-check/

Chinese ships dropped from U.S. routes

It seems that there is enough extra capacity in container shipping carriers’ fleets so that Chinese-built or Chinese owned ships need not be used on Asia-Pacific routes. Carriers have already announced plans to redeploy Chinese-built ships to other routes. So these shipping lines won’t be paying the US port access fees Trump put into place.

Will anyone be paying them? That’s the question now. The Trump administration’s estimates of the revenue these charges will bring in are way too high. No big money for US shipping improvements.

It’s another example of international ocean carriers and shippers’ immense innovativeness when a barrier to trade is erected. These entrepreneurs will always find a way around the barrier. One example here is ships calling at Canadian ports like Prince Rupert or Mexican ports like Ensenada instead of their US counterparts, avoiding the fees, but still able to provide good service via rail into US customers.

Something similar will happen with US tariffs. Enterprises will find a way around the rules.

That’s been happening since the dawn of navigational history, if not before. The American Revolution was in part about avoidance of requirements imposed by England on the shipment of goods between England and its colonies. The American cargo fleet, run by entrepreneurial sea captains and shipping firms, was an end-around the British shipment rules. Imposing those rules made the Americans mad, and added to the furor about independence.

With the Trump tariffs, too, international commerce will find a way. The result will be much lower tariff fee collections than Trump’s ridiculous projections. It won’t pay for much of anything, let alone trillions. We’re only seeing big numbers now because shippers get caught in the uncertainty; thinking the tariffs are off, they ship the goods, but by the time the goods arrive there’s a tariff again. But once burned, twice shy!

We haven’t seen big declines in Asia-West Coast trade yet, even though container unloadings at the West coast ports are down somewhat. But they are coming. Once firms get serious about minimizing landed cost, shipments could drop another 30% or more. And firms will make sure what they do have to ship is paying lower rates, even if they need to shift the source to another country.

The long-term lesson of history is that Tariffs are a weak tool for boosting a nation’s interests. Most often they wind up just making folks in trade mad, and making them less likely to support the tariffing nation’s interests in any way.

Stuart Chirls Friday, September 12, 2025

https://www.freightwaves.com/news/rates-spin-as-chinese-ships-dropped-from-u-s-routes