Tag Archives: container shipping

ILA stops negotiations with USMX

The labor deal between US East and Gulf Coast ports and the International Longshoreman’s Association (ILA) may be unraveling. The current agreement expires at the end of September. It was a six-year deal.

The major issue at present is an Auto Gate system Maersk and APM Terminals are using that processes trucks autonomously, with no ILA labor. The union claims this directly contradicts what was agreed in the last union contract.

Automation and protection of ILA jobs have for years now been a bone of contention between the union and the alliance of container carriers, direct employers, and port associations that serve US ports, which is called the United States Maritime Alliance (USMX). The same was true on the West Coast, when the recent strike was averted by a new contract with the Pacific Maritime Association.

There’s no easy way to find resolution. Automation reduces jobs for longshoremen, though it creates support jobs, for which most union longshoremen are not qualified. And retraining these longshoremen may be difficult, even if some way could be found to fund it. Each side thinks the other ought to pay for the retraining. And in the short run, there will still be a workforce reduction.

The September 30, 2024 expiration date looks like it may not be met; however both sides have usually agreed to continue work as usual while still negotiating. However, openly violating terms of the contract, especially without full discussion with the union, is a good way to get their dander up, and prolong the negotiations.

Best to practice transparency and full disclosure.

Logistics Management logo

By Jeff Berman June 10, 2024

https://www.logisticsmgmt.com/article/ila_stops_negotiations_with_usmx_with_deal_set_to_expire_at_the_end_of_september

Why are container spot rates surging?

The evidence seems to show that it’s because shippers are booking more. It’s possibly because they are afraid of more disruptions, such as the Red Sea attacks and closures such as Baltimore and the Panama Canal delays.

Drewry’s says there is no shortage of ships, even for the longer routes bypassing the Red Sea. And there is a glut of new ships slated to come into service soon. But demand is driving the price rises. The graph shows loaded volumes on key container routes and changes since a year ago. It’s from the Drewry’s interview in the link below.

Graph showing loaded volumes on key container routes and changes since a year ago from Drewry Maritime Research.

Source: Drewry Maritime Research derived from Container Trades Statistics, enquiries@drewry.co.uk

It is well worth listening to. The Drewry’s expert has a firm, data-driven grip on what’s happening in container shipping.

29 May 2024

https://www.drewry.co.uk/maritime-research-opinion-browser/freight-loop—why-are-spot-rates-surging

Surcharges, artificial demands and market opportunists

Xeneta, a data analytics firm specializing in shipping markets, has presented some data for their webinar January 25, 2024.

One of the most striking figures is the percentage of loads being shifted from negotiated contract rates to freight-all-kinds (FAK) rates. The latter are substantially higher in most cases and allow for additional accessory charges to be added.

One of those extra surcharges is for the risk associated with Red Sea transits. The Houthi attacks from Yemen have made sailing the Red Sea more dangerous, even though a consortium naval fleet is patrolling and has even hit Houthi positions in Yemen. There’s no question that insurance rates have increased for Red Sea transits.

These changes not only increase shipper cost, but also add to the volatility of load charges. Shippers have more trouble doing business when they can’t estimate their shipping costs precisely enough.

There’s also a fear that carriers are creating ‘artificial demand’, by blanking sailings. Discussions of a shortage of containers also lead shippers to book sooner than might be required. There’s not exactly a shortage. But changes to the routes are playing havoc with the ability to reposition containers. That means there could be a temporary shortage, and if a particular shipper is affected it creates a negative perception of the ocean carriers.

Freight forwarders are worried that this demand creation will pull forward shipments that could have been delivered later. There could be a large dropoff in business later in the year.

All this turmoil means shippers need to begin thinking about renegotiating contracts now before the season starts. There are many more moving parts to be discussed with the carriers.

Xeneta clearly hopes their data service will be chosen to aid in the negotiations. But the careful analysis provided should alert shippers, forwarders, and carriers to the instability and uncertainty in the pricing of ocean shipping services today.

ELOISA TOVEE FEBRUARY 01, 2024

Surcharges, artificial demands and market opportunists