Tag Archives: intermodal

CSX Rail Projects boost intermodal

The CSX (NASDAQ: CSX) first-quarter financial report was very positive. It showed over 5 percentage points improvement in the operating ratio, to 64%. Operating ratio is a metric much watched in the rail industry, as it shows how efficiently the line is moving and using equipment. The formula for calculating the Operating Ratio is:

OR = 100 * Operating Expenses / Operating Revenue

What it Covers: Operating expenses typically include fuel, labor, equipment maintenance, and materials. It does not include taxes, interest, or other non-operating costs. In particular it doesn’t cover capital improvements to the rail line and equipment.

The industry benchmark for this ratio is in the low 60s or even high 50s, when the so-called “Precision Scheduled Railroading” (PSR) strategy is in place. Invented by Hunter Harrison, at the Illinois Central Railroad, PSR began as a series of ‘lean operations’ improvements including speeding up interchange of equipment, and making sure trains interacted on time and customer loads were routed to meet committed schedules the customers expected. His last stop in leading several railroads was at CSX.

As the concept evolved, cost-cutting became the mantra, and this was realized in the adoption of operating ratio as the measure of success.

But modern implementations of PSR-like concepts have included running longer trains on more spaced-out schedules, reducing crew sizes, lengthening crew working hours, reducing rail staff such as inspectors and conductors, reducing the amount of equipment used such as locomotives, adjusting safety and inspection standards to less frequent review, and using more automated inspection equipment and fewer human inspection hours. Some of these actions are not consistent with the original Hunter Harrison practices, especially when pushed to limits.

There have been protests from rail unions over practices that reduce rail staff and compromise train safety. Some of these have surfaced at major accident sites such as the derailment and toxic spill at East Palestine, OH in 2023, where defect-detection technology failures and lack of human inspection were implicated in the accident. The rail involved was Norfolk Southern (NS).

Intermodal freight increases were instrumental in the financial good tidings presented in the report. And with fuel prices escalating, intermodal should be the go-to choice for shippers looking to reduce their exposure to rising fuel costs. Intermodal freight can replace many highway trucks, and save lots of fuel. More intermodal shifts are required than for straight trucking; but for longer movements, intermodal has been a winner for a while.

To me the most interesting feature of the report is the pending completion of a new double-stack tunnel and bridge clearance project between Baltimore and Philadelphia. The map below indicates the location of project elements.

A key element is the Howard Street Tunnel project. This capital project allows CSX to run double-stack intermodal trains from Baltimore to Philadelphia, and beyond. It opens the Northeast to improved rail-container traffic from Southeast ports. This will improve transit times for shippers. The project is a capital project, and its cost is not reflected in the operating ratio, but represents CSX making investments of its surpluses in infrastructure that will improve service both long-term and short-term. Especially now, with fuel prices at highs and going up, customers will have a more reliable and sustainable alternative to trucks.

CSX also made improvements in its intermodal terminals and interchange in the Chicago area, removing bottlenecks of long standing at the Barr Yard. Chicago has been a bottleneck for East-West transfer for many years, and relieving it should have been a major priority for years. CSX’s action is important because of potential competition with the potential merged rail UP (Union Pacific) and NS, which will create a coast-to-coast national rail service with more leverage to eliminate its bottlenecks.

Trains.com Staff·Wednesday, April 22, 2026

https://www.freightwaves.com/news/csx-sees-stronger-first-quarter-earnings-as-costs-fall-volume-rises

Leaf Logistics launches multi-shipper dedicated fleets

Leaf Logistics, an innovative truckload freight platform, has a unique recipe for reducing unloaded miles and matching carriers with driver-friendly routes, called Flex Fleets. It coordinates truckload freight between shippers and logistics service providers (LSPs) like trucking firms and freight brokers. The concept is that LSPs act as dedicated carriers over a short time for packages of loads from different shippers, but on approximately the same route. The claim is that users can experience a 75% or more reduction in slack or empty travel time for trucks.

I interviewed Anshu Prasad, CEO of Leaf, for some perspective on how the new Flex Fleets system works. The essence is an analytical system that compiles load histories from all the shippers who sign up, projects them to the future, and builds blocks of future loads from one node to another. Leaf Logistics calls this a route.

The image below shows the historical traffic by day on a specific route (think LA to PHX, for instance), with a moving average trend. The green bars display a way to ‘chunk’ the demand into blocks that would make attractive short-term contracts for a haulier. These are called Flex Contracts. Thus from about June 10 to July 15, there is a base volume of 3 loads a day to be handled by a dedicated contract.

That contract is much easier to digest for the LSP. It also assures shippers whose loads are in the block that there is a ‘dedicated’ resource to handle that base load. It’s much easier to create a Flex Contract; no long-term commitment, prices somewhere between spot and negotiated prices, and more flexibility for both parties. As you can see there’s a dip anticipated just after that block, and perhaps the shippers would not want 3 trucks per day available.

What’s in it for LSPs? Their alternative is to try selling dedicated services to many shippers to fill out schedules on a route, but there is a long sales cycle with each shipper, and some shippers would be bound to attract bids from others, breaking your grip. Traditional contracts are typically for longer periods, partly because they are hard to negotiate. And through Leaf, management is easier. Leaf estimates that an average of 20 or more ‘touches’ via EDI, email or calls can be reduced to under 5 using Flex.

Leaf’s Adapt data analysis constructs multi-shipper routes, and the LSP chooses a Flex Contract for such a route. The route can reduce unloaded miles and assure drivers they can fulfill them on time. It’s an advantage if an LSP wants to give drivers a ‘home life’. Quality of life is becoming an essential factor to keep drivers on board and happy. And eliminating unloaded miles and gaps in rolling service is huge; it’s the largest capacity loss in trucking logistics today.

Flex Fleets operates only with truckload (TL) shipments today, the largest segment of trucking. They have about 400 shippers enrolled; the shippers need to disclose historical data on their traffic lanes to Flex, though not to each other. Flex uses the traffic gathered to compute its route blocks. It’s a reasonable compromise with information that is not that useful for competition in reality. Flex is now in trials including reefer traffic.

Leaf usually enrolls the shippers’ preferred trucking vendors, so shippers do not need to worry about qualifying trucking firms again. The LSPs like it, because they get the Flex Fleets benefits of guaranteed loads in a workable pattern over a longer time horizon. Of course, all the carriers are insured. If something happens on a route, like an accident, weather, or carrier no-show, Leaf makes good on the route with a failover plan to ensure completion.

I asked Anshu if there was a plan to introduce Leaf’s concepts into container drayage, an area plagued with turnover, contracting issues, and driver exploitation. Anshu wants to test and refine the Flex concepts first before trying that difficult area. Drayage is an area with many owner-operators. The Leaf system does not have owner-operators as carriers. If one wants to participate, she could sign up with a trucker or broker who joins. Anshu says studies have shown that many full-truckload owner-operators work that way, possibly up to 70%.

Everyone benefits from the Flex Fleets idea to induce cooperative behavior on the part of shippers and LSPs. The shorter duration contract— a month to a year— with fewer conditions is easier to accept or say no to.

  • Shippers benefit from dedicated and scalable capacity, without having to purchase or lease their own fleet — currently, they commit to fleets for years and have to pay for maintenance, regardless of utilization. Flex Fleets save shippers up to 30% on their line haul costs.
  • Carriers benefit from consistent business and preferable freight, eliminating driver downtime and fleet empty miles — 40% of all trucks on the road today ride empty. Tender rejections drop from 30% to 0. 
  • Brokers benefit from enabling drivers to accurately predict their earnings, work from a preferred domicile, maximize their number of paid miles driven and return home each night for an improved quality of life on and off the road. For instance, Sage Freight has seen driver turnover drop from 75% to 15% or less on dedicated freight. 
  • Everyone benefits from reducing emissions by eliminating empty miles and delays. ESG ratings are improved in the fastest way for truckload haulage.

We have been saying for years that logistics is the only place in business where cooperation is routine. But in truckload, it hasn’t been. We need intelligent systems, like Leaf’s Flex Fleets, to identify how it can be made routine and easy.

Anshu indicates that he and his leadership team, some of whom worked together previously, have a long-term commitment to their business idea. That’s why they are growing deliberately with tested concepts, and why they have not sought large venture investments like many young logistics software firms. Instead, they want persistent solutions to the problem of cooperation that will capture the next-generation logistics information market.

And they’ll be helping truckers with some of their most intractable problems.

The worst January for US intermodal for ten years, and no sign of relief

It’s no wonder that US intermodal traffic is declining. Poor service from the railroads has made using any system that involves a transfer an invitation to delays. And shippers can’t afford delays.

Companies offering intermodal container service don’t have enough pull with the railroads in the US to get highly regular service. And now that container rates are dropping fast, shippers won’t pay an excessive amount for the service. So the large rails don’t feel any obligation to serve them well.

Will the major rail lines make any adjustments? My guess is they will be dragged kicking and screaming to provide more reliable service. The fuss they are making over simply making regular deliveries of feed grains to major customers, and the resistance to reciprocal switching, and the labor difficulties they are experiencing show that they don’t feel that customer service is top of their mind.

Why not? Recently I read a book about Charles Lowell, a young man from Massachusetts who fought in the Civil War. Before the war, and after graduating first in his class from Harvard, he worked as an agent in Iowa for a firm building railways west in that state. Each time they completed 25 miles of railway, the firm got a large new swath of land from the US government. The firm had to survey the land, decide on their route through it, and sell the land they didn’t need to fund the next 25 miles. They sold the land to migrants, from the east or from other countries, who were moving west to obtain cheap land for farms and businesses, their piece of the American Dream. There was a lot of graft in these land dealings. But Lowell insisted that his firm sell at a fair price and not engage in special deals with investors speculating on the land. His reason was interesting and farsighted.

Lowell believed that the railroad needed customers, and that was what he was creating by selling them land.

Today’s railroad executives don’t seem to think they need customers.

There are plenty of reasons to use intermodal for container shipment. It reduces emissions. It could be faster. It could require fewer transloads. (Most US truck traffic from ports is transloaded to 53-foot truck chassis before a cross-country trip). And it could be safer, and cheaper, or at least no higher in price, for the shipper. Rail lines could participate in this effort to reduce pollution while making the business profitable for them by operating their lines efficiently to accommodate it. But it does require them to serve their customers, those who want to ship on intermodal.

Too bad rails can’t seem to focus on the advantages it offers and shape their business around it. It would save the hassle of government regulation forcing them to accommodate it.

By Ian Putzger, Americas correspondent 10/02/2023

The worst January for US intermodal for ten years, and no sign of relief – The Loadstar