Tag Archives: trucking

FMCSA rejects 2nd shot at $75,000 truck-broker bond exemption

The second article explains nicely the difference between a truck freight broker and a truck dispatcher.

Dispatchers work for and represent owner-operator truck drivers, trying to get loads for them at a higher price. Shippers pay the trucker, and dispatchers get a commission from the trucker.

Truck Brokers work for shippers, trying to get them a lower price. They bill the shippers and pay the truckers directly.

Currently, only brokers need to get a license from FMCSA and obtain a $75,000 bond, ostensibly to protect shippers from being paid if there is non-performance or damage. Dispatchers are not covered by the federal bonding requirement.

Dispatchers claim the additional regulation is unnecessary, but they have not been able to attract any political attention to their cause. Various approaches have been tried, including the latest one from the first article.

While the STB has been mandated by Congress to make a clear definition of a broker, there’s no timeline for that happening. Dispatchers would like to have clarity that their status is legitimate, and without a bond. They claim that by representing the trucker herself, they are definitely not brokers.

Some dispatchers may be a bit shady, perhaps overcharging truckers and not providing definitive paperwork to the trucker. Clearly, shady business practices shouldn’t be tolerated, but requiring a bond isn’t going to weed out cheating dispatchers.

John Gallagher, Washington Correspondent Wednesday, December 15, 2021

FMCSA rejects 2nd shot at $75,000 truck-broker bond exemption – FreightWaves

FreightLab Co-Director Gives Expert Testimony on Improving Trucking Capacity

David Correll cited his research from the Driver Initiative to congress at a hearing. He claims truck drivers are underutilized, largely because of bottlenecks outside their control. Some of these are warehouse hours, loading and unloading delays, and other issues that cause drivers to waste time idling. And they may not even get paid for the idle time.

He thinks, and I agree, that there’s no easy solution. People simply don’t value drivers’ time. It’s going to take a revolution in thinking on the part of people who are served by drivers and who serve them.

And parking places and bathrooms! Treat truckers like human beings.

December 01, 2021

FreightLab Co-Director Gives Expert Testimony on Improving Trucking Capacity at Congressional Hearing | Center for Transportation and Logistics

Trucking trade group to Gov. Newsom: Enforce law on port fees

California law AB 45 prevents ports and terminals from charging detention and demurrage fees for containers not picked up or empties not delivered when the facilities prevent drivers from picking up or delivering.

Sometimes, the authorities or facilities institute sudden rules changes that prevent delivery of empty containers or prevent pickup of specific cargo because of hours or appointments. These rules are troublesome and cost time for drivers. And often the drivers or their firms are the ones paying the fees.

The contention is that the ports are by their own actions forcing expenses on the trucking firms and drivers.

The law, if enforced, would keep ports and terminals from charging these fees. But how to enforce the law is not altogether clear.

Clarissa Hawes, Senior Editor, Investigations and Enterprise Friday, Novvember 5, 2021

Trucking trade group to Gov. Newsom: Enforce law on port fees – FreightWaves