Author Archives: just2bruce

Supply Chain by Design: Service Level Measures in the Supply Chain

Service Levels are fine, but how are they measured? Mike Watson of Northwestern, via Dan Gilmore and Supply Chain Digest, bring this interesting discussion.

I’m reminded of years ago when we installed a system allowing customers to dial an automated speech system that told them where in our system their order was.  It was supposed to reduce phone calls to the salesman followed by phone calls to the factory (this pre-dated universal email!).  The system worked great; but when we talked to customers they said they didn’t use it. Reason: manufacturing had only put in three possible stages– ordered, in process, and delivered! They weren’t disclosing anything in the middle!

One factor Mike is not yet talking about is how to use service levels to coordinate transport suppliers’ activities.  Carriers would be able to work better if they could group customer bundles that require the same service together. There’s no common standard to do that. The closest we come is Amazon’s Prime, which specifies two-day delivery when it is available for a product.  Since virtually all the packages shipped that way are very similar, the standard works well for Amazon, and actually we are seeing convergence on it among other firms sell packages and deliver them.   Package carriers can coordinate on doing the things in their work that assure the two-day deadline is met, and it’s clearly an exception if that does not happen. They’re free to figure out themselves how to do it, and risk losing the business if they can’t maintain a high enough score on the standard.  But it’s hard to generalize this when you have a service subject to large delays, and a very complex carrier and handling network, such as container shipping. My partner Chris Clott of SUNY Maritime and I wrote something on this and presented it at the last IAME meeting in 2016, at Hamburg Germany.

So it is great to see others talking about the many issues in SLAs that need some kind of standardization to provide a coordinating benefit.

Supply Chain Digest LogoWhite Paper: An Introduction to Service Level in the Supply Chain, Part 1

Source: Supply Chain by Design: Service Level Measures in the Supply Chain

FMC Rejects Japanese Trio’s Shipping Agreement 

More on the issues of mergers.

The rejection was technical, based on the fact that the three companies wanted to share information prior to a merger.  The FMC claimed no jurisdiction in this case. After the merger, the alliance could be reconsidered and might be allowed to share data.  I don’t feel it will ultimately affect the alliance plans.

 Source: FMC Rejects Japanese Trio’s Shipping Agreement | World Maritime News

Maersk Line to Pay $4 Billion for Hamburg Süd

More mergers in ocean carrier ranks. Payback out of savings in 8 years. And what does this do to alliances?  We’ll find out, won’t we?

Maersk has finalized its purchase of container shipping line Hamburg Süd from the Oetker Group after both boards approved a Sale and Purchase Agreement today.

Source: Maersk Line to Pay $4 Billion for Hamburg Süd – Supply Chain 24/7

logo
By Mike Wackett (The Loadstar) – “Organised chaos” – that’s how one carrier describes the Asia-Europe schedules of the Ocean and THE alliances, believing there’s very little hope of vessels hitting itineraries before June. The source, an alliance member, told The Loadstar the transition of ships and containers from previous schedules to their new alliance hubs […]

screenshot-gcaptain.com 2017-04-28 10-03-26Source: New Shipping Alliances Bringing Chaos to Asia-Europe Tradelanes – gCaptain