Author Archives: just2bruce

Trucking industry concerned about SEC’s proposed climate rules

This article is interesting because of the dilemma of small trucking firms. The SEC will soon require disclosure of climate impact by companies, which will include how they ship their goods. There are scope 1, scope 2 and scope 3 emissions. Scope 3 emissions come from the partners used in supply chains. That would mean documenting the emissions from trucking and other cargo movements. It would include also outbound logistics, such as Amazon Prime. Shipper firms would require their suppliers to provide the required information about their emissions. Smaller firms might be at a disadvantage, having to invest in the equipment and people to monitor those emissions and make improvements. Small truck lines think that would offer an unfair advantage to large carriers, because customers would require this information to participate in bidding.

According to the first article by Alyssa Sporrer, large trucking firms support the SEC disclosure rules. That’s because they are already serious about their sustainability efforts, especially environmentally, and it will give them a chance to showcase their efforts.

Sustainability is also in the news in California. CARB, a state agency, has $125 million available for funding for clean off-road equipment, such as that used in ports and freight yards. The program is administered by Calstart, a clean transportation nonprofit. The equipment must be zero-emission, which means electric for the most part. Most of the equipment will be for terminal tractors, on and off-road, refrigeration units, cargo handling equipment, railcar movers and switchers, and airport ground support equipment.

The nice thing about this program is that it does not require firms to retire existing equipment.

The Calstart program prides itself on putting money to work for reduced emissions in places like port communities where excess emissions have caused health problems in the past.

Alyssa Sporrer Thursday, July 14, 2022

Trucking industry concerned about SEC’s proposed climate rules – FreightWaves

Alyssa Sporrer Monday, July 18, 2022

California offers up to $500,000 for purchases of zero-emissions equipment – FreightWaves

Container glut pushes down second-hand prices, but carriers still ordering new

There are now too many containers in the world. And they are cluttering up the ports and yards we need to move containers through. And they cause detention and demurrage charges, because lines won’t move them out of ports.

The global container pool is around 50 million TEU right now. According to Drewry, that is an excess of 6 million TEU. However, Drewry is not too concerned about the excess at present, feeling they can be absorbed if trade picks up. Interestingly, Drewry seems to think that the excess will be absorbed by ‘slower sailing’!

As economics tells us to expect, the price of second-hand containers is falling. However, some carriers, such as Evergreen, continue to order more. Most containers are built in China these days. Three Chinese firms, with state connections, are the primary sources. The problem is that empty used containers cost a lot to return to exporting destinations. They displace paying cargo, forcing ocean carriers to use space to carry them. And especially, with the cost of bunker fuel in the stratosphere, and the need to use very low sulfur fuel in some busy port areas, the transportation cost is high. Ocean carriers have to ‘bundle’ the cost of returns into the one-way cost of the loaded shipment. Either that, or they take a hit by moving the old containers back.

The Seatrade article by Gary Howard has nice graphs showing the average price of 40-foot used containers in Europe, and in China, provided by Container xChange. Again the question of where excess containers will be stored is raised. There haven’t been many answers to that one yet.

By Martina Li in Taiwan 19/07/2022

Container glut pushes down second-hand prices, but carriers still ordering new – The Loadstar
Seatrade logo

Gary Howard | Jul 19, 2022

6m teu oversupply of containers after ‘reactionary’ ordering

America’s freight railroads are incredibly chaotic right now

Right now there’s a big railroad strike looming. There’s also a potential strike coming up among West Coast dock workers. And there is labor unrest elsewhere in the supply chain area, including warehouse workers and independent contractor drivers.

It’s obvious that when things are difficult for employers, that’s the time to stage a strike if you’re a union. The circumstances offer the opportunity to generate maximum impact on the firms.

But the railroads have many other problems that coalesce into a serious decline in service. Rails were all excited about PSR, or precision scheduled railroading, an effort to apply some lean principles to the management of rail traffic. The trouble with lean, however, is always in the interpretation. It’s easy for managers to get carried away and cut too deeply, whether it be equipment, labor, or other resources. It makes the bottom line look good instantly, but reduced flexibility to deal with change. And it may even reduce customer service, if that isn’t measured in a sound fashion, that takes the customer interest into account. I’m afraid some of the rails did not perform their lean transformation that well.

The Covid epidemic didn’t help, either. It created a temporary decline in demand, and it was easy to ride that trend downward and reduce inputs too much. That’s what happened here. The rails simply cut staff too deep. And now that demand for rail has increased, it’s really hard to catch up.

The Great Resignation or Relocation is also amplifying the problem. People don’t want to keep jobs that make them work hours they don’t want, or force them into a difficult lifestyle. So even if union contracts are signed, there’s no guarantee that workers will become available for the rails. They may decide to choose other jobs and lifestyles. Make the job too hard, and no one will want it.

I feel that rails took their eye off the ball— customer service. Customers depend on rail for reliable on-time delivery, within the requirements for their use of the products. That means the trains have to run on time. There can’t be shortages of equipment or labor. When those are cut too deeply, it’s hard to bring them back quickly.

And the financial implications, to stock prices, and now high inflation, also work against the executives making difficult decisions to not cut so deep. Inflation makes capital items harder to replace. And the labor shortage means that higher wages will hurt the bottom line, since the raises ought to be offered to everyone, not just new workers— that’s the basic law of monopsony.

So the chaos in dispatching and routing for rails today is not entirely due to labor in my opinion. It’s also due to the big rails not continuing to invest in infrastructure improvements, in switching yards and equipment that would support their goals of reducing future congestion and costs. And they will need to cooperate as well. Allowing customers to cross-connect would help. Improving switching yards, or humps, to make switching cars and trains faster, would help. In a few places, double-track and double-stack would help. And better port-to-rail connectivity would help.

Rails also can’t ignore the agriculture supply chains which rely on them for both exports and domestic deliveries. Those chains aren’t as profitable as some others but have to be served. We allowed the rails to abandon passenger transportation years ago. But we can’t allow them to abandon other business sectors that depend on them.

Rachel Premack Thursday, July 14, 2022

America’s freight railroads are incredibly chaotic right now – FreightWaves

Joanna Marsh Wednesday, July 13, 2022

Rail union members could go on strike Monday amid contract impasse – FreightWaves