Category Archives: Shipping

Rickmers Maritime: ‘modern Greek tragedy’ 

Firms that charter out ships to others to move cargo are in big trouble. There’s a squeeze, with overcapacity in the usage market, and  capitalization issues in these asset based firms, who need to borrow to own ships, but do not try to use them themselves, instead finding others to rent to.  Some of these firms will probably go down, as Rickmers Maritime Trust did. Stock price is no measure of a firm’s chance for success. Post-US election and Brexit, volatility of international trade factors is a given, and these firms, as intermediaries, are ideally placed to suffer most from the oscillations.  They need predictability to buy ships for the long term, and rent (charter) them for a shorter term.

What’s the future?  Interest rates are bound to go up!  Charter rates are not going up, and may go down quite a bit.  It will be harder to find credit worthy customers, since they cannot predict their demand as well as before.  We will see higher bad debt problems, such as Hanjin posed.

Loss of some of these intermediaries will reduce the options available for those who want to move cargo, and will increase capital needs just as that is the last thing they need.

Source: Analysis: Rickmers Maritime not alone; we may see a modern Greek tragedy – The Loadstar

Maersk has settled in at the world’s ship graveyard

A fascinating, heartfelt article about shipbreaking at Alang. Students of Labor Economics and unions should read it, especially the last part.

screenshot-shippingwatch-com-2016-10-13-10-41-06  ShippingWatch visits one of the most controversial places in the shipping industry, India’s shipbreaking facilities on the beaches of Alang. After banning this location, Maersk has changed its mind and now sends end-of-life vessels to Alang. See all the pictures here from an otherwise very closed-off workplace. – Author: GRETCHEN PEDERSEN

Source: Maersk has settled in at the world’s ship graveyard

Container Weighing breeds profit snatchers

Talk about unintended consequences.

The Verified Gross Mass (VGM) rule promulgated by the International Maritime Organization (IMO) on July 1, 2016 is intended to make cargo and ships safer, by making sure that container weights are properly recorded. when you are loading a ship, it’s good to know how the weight is distributed. if people give you containers overfilled, you won’t have the right balance on your ship.  A ship might turn over, or other containers might be damaged if there’s a shift in cargo.

But the rule has created an entire industry and a plethora of fees being charged by supply chain partners. they’re presumably to offset ‘costs’ of the rule.  But there is a concern that they are merely ways of increasing profits.  And the fees certainly add to the complexity and cost of a container shipment, and even of identifying the best route for my cargo.

This story about India’s experience highlights some of the bad experiences shippers are having.  And it is affecting which ports are used and which carriers.  Will there ever be rationality in this area? Everyone agrees we want correct weights of containers, unless we want to cheat, but how complex can it be?

shippinglogo51The downside of IMO’s container weighing rule

Source: Shipping Tribune

C