Tag Archives: freight

How changes in supply chain finance disclosure could impact shippers

I’ve been waiting to publish this for quite a while, I know, but I think it’s an important issue. For smaller shippers and carriers, like small independent trucking firms, cash flow is extremely important. Factoring invoices can be a way to insure that the bulk of the money for a bill comes in at a known time, allowing plans for use of the money to be made. It’s also a way for the payer of an invoice, the shipper, to set payment dates at known times, so their cash flow can be managed.

According to the article, there have been recent changes to how factoring is reported on accounting records. In fact, firms did not need to disclose that they were using factoring until the new FASB rule went into effect after Dec 15, 2022.

What this means is that for fiscal years that begin after Dec 15, 2022, the key terms of any supplier finance programs must be disclosed, FASB regulations say: “The key terms of the supplier finance program, including a description of the payment terms (including payment timing and basis for its determination) and assets pledged as security or other forms of guarantees provided for the committed payment to the finance provider or intermediary”.

This includes the amount outstanding that remains unpaid by the buyer at the end of the annual period, a description of where these commitments are shown in the balance sheet, and a “rollforward” including the amount of obligations confirmed and the amount subsequently paid.

These are important rules, because a part of the firm’s activity will be disclosed. It’s always possible to fool around with accounts receivable or payable to make figures look as you wish— that’s usually where delinquent payables or receivables are displayed. But disclosing the amount and timing of the actual obligations at least annually is a good start, especially when factoring is used to help a company running close to the margins maintain a regular cash flow.

It’s also important when you are planning to acquire a small firm. Investigate how the small firm is handling its receivables; are they factoring them? And if so, what is the nature of the deals being contracted. Small firms may not have to fully comply with FASB standards, since they aren’t public companies. Having a firm’s bookkeeper prepare the information required by FASB on supplier financing would be an excellent start. Make sure you fully understand the potential risk in your investment.

Todd Maiden·Saturday, January 07, 2023

How changes in supply chain finance disclosure could impact shippers – FreightWaves

Bryan Strickland, September 30, 2022

FASB updates reporting standard for supplier finance programs

2021 is the year of the freight service embargo

It’s not possible to book shipments anymore with some LTL carriers. Their capacity is full, and they don’t care if they get new customers. OnTrak (which delivers my vitamin pills) and Fedex recently said they were refusing new customers. The claims are that they are out of capacity– not enough planes, trucks and drivers— to deliver everything. There are other less visible bottlenecks, also, such as a shortage of trucks for sale due to the semiconductor shortage. There’s been a sort of crisis in drivers for trucks for quite a while, exacerbated by the recent enforcement of rules to prevent people who fail drug tests from getting commercial driver’s licenses. We wonder why employers don’t pay drivers more, and take more care to create working conditions more favorable to drivers.

Still, common carriers have an obligation to carry the freight presented. It will be interesting to see how far this goes, and when regulators will start crawling through these carriers’ records to see if they are unfairly denying carriage.

Eric Kulisch, Air Cargo Editor Thursday, August 19, 2021

Viewpoint: 2021 is the year of the freight service embargo – FreightWaves

Blockchain explained through college basketball

Here is the original article the Loadstar referred me to.  It is a picture a bit too rosy, perhaps, but quite clear.

It doesn’t say that blockchain’s smart contracts will turn logistics people from a handful of paper shufflers to a handful of logicians whose job is to read and prove out the code of smart contracts.  That code will be embedded and executed in a transaction, without oversight, so it had better be right. How do we prove that?  The arguments will shift from arguing about how the actual contract matches with what happens, and goes wrong– to arguing about both that, and whether the smart contract program had a bug in it.

I think there’s a new frontier for provability software, that can read a program and match it with some specs to see if it matches.  The computer mathematicians already have software that can inspect theorem proofs and say if they are valid or not.  I think we need similar software.

Remember every program has bugs.

screenshot-www.freightwaves.com 2018.02.21 07-36-08  Blockchain explained through college basketball — FreightWaves

logo  via Blockchain explained through college basketball – The Loadstar