Tag Archives: supply chains

Beijing sets port fees and restrictive policies

Retribution for the US port fees for Chinese-owned and Chinese-built ships is already here, even before the fees come into effect. The main effect seems to be a restructuring of shipping services, rather than any actual fees being collected. Operators of liner routes are simply taking the Chinese-related ships off their US runs. Several liner carriers have announced that they propose no surcharges.

I think the most important effect of the Chinese declaration is going to be the loss of data and information about Chinese ports. Most large carriers call at Chinese ports on their loops. No data means a loss of accuracy on arrival times and dwell times at the ports. This will affect all shippers and supply chain partners, making predictions more difficult.

I’m afraid geopolitics will make ocean shipping, and perhaps all kinds of carriage, into a game in which advance knowledge is impossible. We already see some effects in the loss of information from AIS due to spoofing and turning off transmission because of sanctions.


Stuart Chirls
Tuesday, September 30, 2025

https://www.freightwaves.com/news/china-could-bar-u-s-service-ships-in-new-maritime-dispute-volley

China prepares retaliation playbook

China is taking preemptive action against the US’s plans to hike port fees for China-linked tonnage.  The port fees are scheduled to come into effect on October 14, but there haven’t been any administrative rules set yet.

So we don’t know how, or if, they will be collected.

Quite a few experts believe that there won’t ever be any. The box-booking platform Freightos is one source mentioned in the article. Trump has a history of putting penalties out there and giving way in negotiations just before they will go into effect. It’s known as the Trump Always Chickens Out (TACO) effect.

I agree that we may never see any container ship fees. But I am also wary of what Trump may be giving away in the negotiations with China.

And I think history tells us that we will see severe blowback in terms of various trade restraints placed by foreign nations. These will hurt American businesses.

 Sam Chambers September 30, 2025

https://splash247.com/china-prepares-retaliation-playbook-ahead-of-us-port-fee-deadline/

LNG bunker supply chain emissions

It’s difficult to quantify the emissions load generated by LNG bunkering for oceangoing ships. Rystad Energy has released a study of this from Well to Tank.

Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) is currently an important maritime fuel as the industry tries to transition to a lower carbon footprint. LNG-fuelled ships now account for over 20% of the current order book.

The question is this: how does LNG perform in terms of greenhouse emissions? One needs to consider how it’s produced (Well!), transported, liquefied, stored, and processed for bunkering, as well as the loading process. That’s the study’s focus.

They found 13.9 grams of carbon dioxide equivalent per megajoule heating value, known as LHV. This broke down into 4.2 gCO23/MJ, for upsteam; 1.3 for transportation and processing; 5.9 for liquefaction; 1.8 for shipping and distribution; and 0.7 for bunkering operations.

The total of 13.9 compares with the FuelEU Maritime figure of 18.5 gCO2e/MJ, which Rystad says is too high.

A key quote from the article:

Rystad’s Vice President Emissions Research, Patrick King, commented: “Our analysis is based on asset-level data that ties specific gas fields to liquefaction facilities. This approach, supported by satellite-detected methane plume data and reported asset information, gives a more accurate picture of the LNG actually used for bunkering, rather than relying on outdated or overly broad averages.”

It seems like the right way to do the analysis.

The study is available from Rystad Energy or asoffered by Rystad

Seatrade logo

Paul Bartlett, Correspondent

September 4, 2025

https://www.seatrade-maritime.com/lng/rystad-releases-findings-on-lng-bunker-supply-chain-emissions