Tag Archives: transportation

Mexico-to-US intermodal rail service

DP World, the international port container terminal operator, is beginning a new rail service from Mexico to the US for automobiles. It will use 53-foot containers to move the cars by truck or rail. That makes the containers compatible with the standard size container used in the US and Mexico as well, rather than the 40-foot ocean containers. That eliminates a need to transload for US road transport.

It’s a good idea. Large quantities of cars are made in Mexico for the US market. The business is growing, because some automotive components made in China face trade barriers when ocean shipped directly to the US.

Intermodal transport by rail over long distances will reduce emissions considerably. A properly engineered service could compete in travel time with road haulage to a distribution point.

Railroads have notorious problems with reliability of service; they have trouble predicting when arrival may occur. According to rail experts, this is largely due to delays that occur in switching yards, which can be unpredictable in length. And when one stopover in a yard is delayed so the next outbound train is missed, days can be added to transit times.

However, auto transport in containers like this has advantages.

First, at the destinations, cargo owners have some buffer storage, so delayed delivery is seldom critical to business.

Second, the container cars can be mixed and matched on trains, so if some are ready, they can make the train for the next leg; others can wait for the next train. All the containers in the original train needn’t go together. My rail expert thinks this ability to make shorter trains is key to making rail transport more reliable and yard performance more efficient.

Third, intermodal transport of containers has been shown to reduce emissions over individual container transport by truck. That’s important for many shippers today, due to public companies’ need to report Scope 3 emissions.

Finally, there’s a growing demand for car transport from Mexico. The country is proving to be a dependable place to locate auto factories, with adequate labor supply and manufacturing knowledge. There should be plenty of business for DP World.

Noi Mahoney Tuesday, May 21, 2024

https://www.freightwaves.com/news/dp-world-launches-mexico-to-us-intermodal-rail-service

Hoptek helps trucking firms be data literate

Subscribe to continue reading

Subscribe to get access to the rest of this post and other subscriber-only content.

Rail storage fee disputes – STB or FMC?

When containers go by rail to or from ports, we would expect that any detention or storage fees would fall under the Surface Transportation Board (STB) which governs rail traffic in the US. And these fees have become more common, as railroads in the US struggle with manpower shortages, longer trains, lower traffic, and efforts to operate in a leaner fashion. But who to send the bill to?

Many containers are owned by ocean shipping firms, and it would seem like they should be billed if their containers are not picked up in a timely fashion. But it’s the shippers who get the bill.

The Federal Maritime Commission (FMC) has come down with some fairly explicit rules about detention and demurrage charges. The rules specify who is billed, what information must be provided and when, and how disagreements over bills can be resolved, through a process. But when the charges are from rail detention, the FMC claims they have no jurisdiction.

Shippers think the ocean carriers should be billed, and bill disputes be handled at the FMC under the new rules. But ocean carriers think the STB should handle rail demurrage.

I don’t think this can be settled without some Congressional input. It’s one of the gray areas that come up often in logistics, where many partners collaborate to move cargo or cause delays. The parties are never going to agree. For ocean carriers the divided authority is just fine; since they are not getting the rail bills, they have no stake in disputes.

We just need to get a single point of oversight, to lay down rules, like those of the FMC, for demurrage and detention charges including the rail lines. It’s a big ‘just’.

John Gallagher·Friday, May 05, 2023

Ocean carriers: Keep rail storage fee disputes at STB – FreightWaves