Category Archives: Labor Economics

ILA stops negotiations with USMX

The labor deal between US East and Gulf Coast ports and the International Longshoreman’s Association (ILA) may be unraveling. The current agreement expires at the end of September. It was a six-year deal.

The major issue at present is an Auto Gate system Maersk and APM Terminals are using that processes trucks autonomously, with no ILA labor. The union claims this directly contradicts what was agreed in the last union contract.

Automation and protection of ILA jobs have for years now been a bone of contention between the union and the alliance of container carriers, direct employers, and port associations that serve US ports, which is called the United States Maritime Alliance (USMX). The same was true on the West Coast, when the recent strike was averted by a new contract with the Pacific Maritime Association.

There’s no easy way to find resolution. Automation reduces jobs for longshoremen, though it creates support jobs, for which most union longshoremen are not qualified. And retraining these longshoremen may be difficult, even if some way could be found to fund it. Each side thinks the other ought to pay for the retraining. And in the short run, there will still be a workforce reduction.

The September 30, 2024 expiration date looks like it may not be met; however both sides have usually agreed to continue work as usual while still negotiating. However, openly violating terms of the contract, especially without full discussion with the union, is a good way to get their dander up, and prolong the negotiations.

Best to practice transparency and full disclosure.

Logistics Management logo

By Jeff Berman June 10, 2024

https://www.logisticsmgmt.com/article/ila_stops_negotiations_with_usmx_with_deal_set_to_expire_at_the_end_of_september

West Coast container ports hit by labor actions

Apparently the negotiations between the Pacific Maritime Association (PMA) and the International Longshore Workers Union (ILWU) are not going well over wages.

Some peripheral issues have been settled, but union workers want a share of the massive profits generated by the container carriers during the COVID time. PMA represents ocean carriers and terminal operators in the negotiations, and some terminals are controlled or dominated by a carrier or a group of them.

I think that is appropriate. Anyone’s analysis of the labor economics of unions will indicate that unions only have occasional times when they have any leverage over their terms of employment. This is one of them.

They should be expected to bargain hard for wage increases because they have not had a new contract since 2015. A lot of water has gone under the bridge, including massive profits for ocean liner firms. Longshoremen played a large part in the successful import and export of all those containers.

The PMA has not had a good record of conducting these negotiations, sometimes playing hardball when their sponsors would have liked a little softer approach. It’s true that the ILWU is known for its intransigence also.

But now the PMA should make a realistic offer. Inflation is high, there’s no prospect of it moderating very much very soon, and there are all those past years to make up for. Longshoremen deserve to be paid fairly for their work in the light of present, and possibly future, economic conditions.

These incidental stoppages for short times are just warnings. Neither side should want a general strike, because the new increases in West Coast shipping, after a long decline, are just emerging. It’s true some traffic has left for the East Coast, but the facts are that West Coast ports that operate well are still the fastest and most reliable way to ship to America from the Far East. If they are seen as reliable, traffic will return.

Time to step up and make an offer longshoremen are likely to accept.

Greg Miller Sunday, June 04, 2023

West Coast container ports hit as labor talks take ominous turn

Gard emphasizes the S in ESG

ESG is an emerging concern for the maritime industry. And often the focus is on the E for environment. But the S for social good is equally important, and demands more attention. For the maritime industry, the S is many times seafarers and their well-being.

Gard is one of the premier P&I clubs offering marine insurance. It’s based in Arendal, a small Norwegian port city. Gard provides a mutual insurance service covering a wide range of liabilities that may arise from the operation of a vessel, such as pollution, cargo damage, collision, other third-party claims, and of course crew-related matters. 

Gard claims to insure about one-fifth of the world’s seafarers. The top cause for marine casualties and accidents is human error and so it makes a lot of sense for Gard to focus on improving the working environment for seafarers, as better conditions, security and support can reduce distractions and lead to safer ship operations. Gard takes its role as a leader in the P&I marine insurance industry very seriously and is especially proactive in ESG practices.

‘We started a process in 2017 to look at ESG and sustainability more systematically, and how we as a company could make a positive contribution,’ says Rolf Thore Roppestad, Chief Executive of Gard. ‘At the end of the day, we insure people, the environment and property, so our business is all about ESG….We work to make sure they get medical treatment when needed, that they have fair and clear working contracts and that they are compensated if something happens. This is the ‘S’ in ESG.’

An example of Gard’s forward looking approach is their new digital app, the International Mariners Medico Guide, launched in December 2022. It’s free to download, and gives seafarers immediate help and support, even without wifi access. Anyone can download the app, but you must log in with your call sign or IMO number to use it.

The app can be used right at the spot of an illness or accident. That’s of great value. It also can be updated continuously with the latest information for proper care. For instance, emergence of a new virus can be covered as soon as the care information becomes available onshore. ‘For us at Gard, it’s all about being able to help,’ says Lene-Camilla Nordlie, Vice President and Head of People Claims at Gard. ‘Taking care of people is the most important thing that we can do together with the ship owners and the employer. Covid triggered much-needed attention to the challenges of crew on board, and especially that more needs to be done to support mental health,’ she adds.

It is good to see that important firms are taking an interest in seafarers, and working to help them maintain their health and safety.

Vice President, Head of People Claims, Lene-Camilla Nordlie and Chief Executive Rolf Thore Roppestad

(Photo credit Mona Hauglid)