Category Archives: Microeconomics

Micro posts and comments

Shifting Risk Might Be Key to Shipper – 3PL Relations

This article reflects a white paper written with the support of Adelante, a sharing site for 3PLs.

No kidding, transportation and especially 3PL contracts are the essential principal-agent problem form economics. There is plenty of moral hazard to spread around.  We see it all in transport, from shippers laying last minute conditions on truckers at the dock to 3PLs booking passage on unreliable lower cost carriers in fulfillment of a long term contract.

What’s unusual about large shippers offering contracts that ask for the 3PL to assume liabilities (risks) of certain kinds?  Nothing!  The same thing is true about manufacturers dealing with their suppliers of components, especially in the lean world of today.  It’s basic supplier relations.

The key to successful principal-agent arrangements is sharing the total surplus fairly and keeping monitoring costs low.  3PLs with great transparency to their shippers should be able to negotiate better rates. Their role as information hubs reduces transaction costs for the shipper.   In fact some 3PLs are nothing but information hubs.

To succeed in this environment, 3PLs need to excel and offer better results for their shippers than their competitors for the business.    It’s very true that the relationship will ideally be cooperative so both shippers and their 3PLs can win.  And it’s hard to get to.

Shifting Risk and Meeting in the Middle Might Be Key to Shipper & Third-Party Logistics Relations – Supply Chain 24/7.

House passes 2-month transportation funding bill

Well, what’s new?  I just talked yesterday (at Hult International School of Buisness in San Frasncisco) about the locks and dams as well as bridge and road deficiencies, and the inability of our government reps to make a decision on how to pay for necessary infrastructure work.

Let’s get on with it. Money spent on infrastructure repays many times over, by increasing facility in trading goods.  Competitive advantage and the related theories tell us that opening connections increase the pie for all.

American Shipper

House passes 2-month transportation funding bill | AS Daily Newsletter | AS Daily | American Shipper.

I’m worried that people will give up on providing any funding at all if we can’t show the leadership to take some action.   If we have to fall back on specific local measures there will be wholesale resistance from voters.  I’ve heard it in the streets from friends.  People can’t back large investments piecemeal if they don’t see an overarching plan for how the whole problem will be attacked.  Only the federal government can do that– not states, not localities.

The Myth of a Single Market Truckload Rate: Part 2

This approach to rate analysis is interesting. I know from experience, having seen how hard it is to deduce correct truckload rates for a given simulation.  We spent a lot of time divining these rates for a specific need. A generic econometric approach would be useful.  I hope Chris Caplice has a public access paper on the subject.

The Myth of a Single Market Truckload Rate: Part 2.

The same issue applies to rail rates as well.  And they are even more obscure, since one cannot get info on them easily.