Tag Archives: labor negotiations

ILA stops negotiations with USMX

The labor deal between US East and Gulf Coast ports and the International Longshoreman’s Association (ILA) may be unraveling. The current agreement expires at the end of September. It was a six-year deal.

The major issue at present is an Auto Gate system Maersk and APM Terminals are using that processes trucks autonomously, with no ILA labor. The union claims this directly contradicts what was agreed in the last union contract.

Automation and protection of ILA jobs have for years now been a bone of contention between the union and the alliance of container carriers, direct employers, and port associations that serve US ports, which is called the United States Maritime Alliance (USMX). The same was true on the West Coast, when the recent strike was averted by a new contract with the Pacific Maritime Association.

There’s no easy way to find resolution. Automation reduces jobs for longshoremen, though it creates support jobs, for which most union longshoremen are not qualified. And retraining these longshoremen may be difficult, even if some way could be found to fund it. Each side thinks the other ought to pay for the retraining. And in the short run, there will still be a workforce reduction.

The September 30, 2024 expiration date looks like it may not be met; however both sides have usually agreed to continue work as usual while still negotiating. However, openly violating terms of the contract, especially without full discussion with the union, is a good way to get their dander up, and prolong the negotiations.

Best to practice transparency and full disclosure.

Logistics Management logo

By Jeff Berman June 10, 2024

https://www.logisticsmgmt.com/article/ila_stops_negotiations_with_usmx_with_deal_set_to_expire_at_the_end_of_september

Work resumes at LA/LB ports, but contract settlement stays out of reach

There’s no labor agreement in sight for West Coast ports. And recently there have been short unannounced work stoppages by the unions.

I’m thinking these work stoppages are trial balloons. The major union at the ports, the International Longshore and Warehouse Union (ILWU), may be trying to gauge the impact of a stoppage on the ports. We all know that the ocean shipping market is weak, and in addition quite a bit of container traffic has moved away from the West Coast ports, to the East Coast. So volumes are down at the West Coast ports.

It’s possible that cargo volumes are so light that a full strike will jeopardize the ports’ business. A sizeable reduction in container traffic would reduce the demand for longshoremen and union workers. They don’t want to kill the golden goose. A mini-trial would tell them whether the ports would be severely hurt by a strike. Otherwise the ports might say “Go ahead and strike!”

I think that is why the US government is loath to intervene yet. Continuing to negotiate might be the best way to get an outcome everyone can live with.

Ian Putzger, Americas Correspondent 11/04/2023

Work resumes at LA/LB ports, but contract settlement stays out of reach – The Loadstar