Tag Archives: automation

ILA stops negotiations with USMX

The labor deal between US East and Gulf Coast ports and the International Longshoreman’s Association (ILA) may be unraveling. The current agreement expires at the end of September. It was a six-year deal.

The major issue at present is an Auto Gate system Maersk and APM Terminals are using that processes trucks autonomously, with no ILA labor. The union claims this directly contradicts what was agreed in the last union contract.

Automation and protection of ILA jobs have for years now been a bone of contention between the union and the alliance of container carriers, direct employers, and port associations that serve US ports, which is called the United States Maritime Alliance (USMX). The same was true on the West Coast, when the recent strike was averted by a new contract with the Pacific Maritime Association.

There’s no easy way to find resolution. Automation reduces jobs for longshoremen, though it creates support jobs, for which most union longshoremen are not qualified. And retraining these longshoremen may be difficult, even if some way could be found to fund it. Each side thinks the other ought to pay for the retraining. And in the short run, there will still be a workforce reduction.

The September 30, 2024 expiration date looks like it may not be met; however both sides have usually agreed to continue work as usual while still negotiating. However, openly violating terms of the contract, especially without full discussion with the union, is a good way to get their dander up, and prolong the negotiations.

Best to practice transparency and full disclosure.

Logistics Management logo

By Jeff Berman June 10, 2024

https://www.logisticsmgmt.com/article/ila_stops_negotiations_with_usmx_with_deal_set_to_expire_at_the_end_of_september

Quote

How robots change the world | Oxford Economics

Thanks to Supply Chain Digest for promoting this study by Oxford Economics.  Read the article here for a synopsis of its findings: Supply Chain News: Oxford Economics Says Robots Benefits will Outweigh Cons

Basically, it says robots will greatly raise productivity and take jobs with a repetitive aspect, displacing workers toward jobs with high cognitive content.  But there may be local dislocations that will be hard for some people.   We’d better prepare for that and put in measures to alleviate the suffering, if we care about people and their lives.  They think about 1.6 jobs will be lost for every job robots take. but GNP may grow 5% as a result.  China is the major user of robots now, and the revolution promises to be harder on them than any other country as it looks now.

It isn’t clear from the summary whether the 1.6 jobs lost will be found again in other sectors, such as service and sales, support of the robots, or technical work like fixing the robots.  Nonetheless this kind of assessment is an eye opener to concerns we may have in our economy and political world for quite a while.

The report is available here:  How robots change the world | Oxford Economics

Or here: Oxford Economics 2019 Report – How Robots Change the World

 

Quote

Cost, operational challenges hinder port automation

Ben Meyer in American Shipper has summarized a McKinsey report on port automation and port modernization.  One interesting point in the discussion is that port operators are actually not seeing productivity gains in automated ports. Throughputs are actually slower.  They have some explanations for this, but it is a real problem.

It struck me that automation is often seen as going hand in hand with better visibility of cargoes in the port and readiness for delivery.  to the extent that the software requires automation, there may be a correlation here that does not bode well in the medium term.

In the long term it may well turn out better, but meanwhile, the customer may suffer.

 

amshipper_redbanner_left12

via Cost, operational challenges hinder port automation