Tag Archives: news

Addressing Flag State Abuse in Shipping

There’s a lot more attention being paid to Flag States for shipping, and what kind of job they’re doing to police their members. Much of the attention is due to the abuse of flag state status by companies and owners who want to avoid being caught up in sanctions.

Sanction regimes from major powers, US, UK, EU Paris MOU, and Tokyo MOU, are getting more strict, and exposing companies to much more risk. However, if flag states don’t proactively enforce rules, they could attract ships that do not intend to play by the general international rules.

Some of these rules deal with insurance and protection for cargo owners. Some deal with care of mariners, and some with proper behavior in cargo handling, such as ship-to-ship transfers and carbon emissions in protected international spaces.

Here we highlight an example of lax enforcement turning into stricter rules. In this article, Cameroon, an African nation which operates a ship registry that has grown very fast recently, is going to purge the registry of ships that are sanctioned by the three sanctioning groups. Cameroon has also reportedly stopped new registration of ships known to be sanctioned.

Owners of those ships will need to move them to another registry. There have been frequent accidents involving ships with Cameroon registry; the average age of the fleet registered there is 32.7 years. This is much older than many operators choose to run ships.

Sam Chambers February 13, 2026

https://splash247.com/cameroon-clamps-down-on-shadow-fleet-as-flag-purge-begins/

Shipping rules are principally controlled by the International Maritime Organization (IMO) though other UN agencies play a role. In the next article, the IMO announced a campaign to combat fraud in ship registration. Fraud is a tactic often used by shadow fleet members to get around rules. These ships will claim to be registered in a flag registry when they are not. Sometimes the claimed nation does not even have a registry.

Flagging a ship in a nation’s registry makes shipboard conduct subject to that nation’s laws. Even when a ship is properly registered with a flag, there could be gaps between IMO standards, agreed to by most nations, and national laws. One prominent area is labor rules for mariners, which sometimes are violated by ships’ management.

The IMO can conduct audits of registries’ practice, and the consistency of national and international laws. It’s planning to step up those audits. This will make it harder for shadow shipping to continue practices that do not meet international shipping standards.

Published Feb 12, 2026 11:06 PM by The Maritime Executive

https://maritime-executive.com/article/imo-ramps-up-campaign-to-close-flag-state-enforcement-gap

Update 2/17/2026:

Madagascar, which has no registry, reports multiple ships falsely claiming it as a flag state.

Sam Chambers, February 17, 2026

https://splash247.com/madagascar-exposes-fraudulent-flag-scam/

Resilience blind spot in shipment routing

Companies have done a lot of work on supply chains in the last year to improve their resilience to geopolitical glitches. It’s been hard work to diversify suppliers to different countries to lessen risk.

But another form of risk is control of the terminals and transfer points on shipping routes. The article here notes that the port of Shanghai in China has grown at over 6% annually, even though the Chinese economy only grew at 3.5%. What’s using all that capacity? The answer is that many shipping routes still move through Shanghai even though the origin and final destination of the cargo is not in China. The routes themselves are subject to disruption if relations with China sour.

It’s also worthwhile to point out that Chinese entities control or have major financial interests in many ports round the world. If a shipper really wants to assure some independence from China, she will have to examine their shipping routes as well as the country of origin.

Is there a way to look at this connectivity? The article suggests an analysis by SKU of the port connectivity involved in the supply. A high-level indicator is provided by UNCTAD’s port connectivity index, available at this link.

To see how the index works, read this: https://unctad.org/news/new-context-calls-changing-how-we-measure-maritime-connectivity The six major components are given here:

  1. Number of direct connections: The more countries can be reached through direct shipping services, i.e. without requiring a transshipment, the faster and less risky is the connection.
  2. Number of weekly calls: The more often ships depart from a port, the lower the waiting time for the shipper.
  3. Number of companies providing services: The more choices shippers have, the less likely they are confronted with potential negative impacts of oligopolistic or monopolistic markets (i.e. higher prices and lower service quality).
  4. A higher number of services is an indicator of shipping options for the importer and exporter. Services may be provided jointly by various carriers, and each carrier may provide several services.
  5. Total deployed carrying capacity: The TEU[i] that can be imported and exported to/ from a country is an indication of the total transport service supply.
  6. Size of the largest ship: Larger container ships are more likely to be deployed in hub ports, providing additional connectivity to importers and exporters from the port thanks to trade between third countries. Also, ports that can accommodate larger ships tend to have better port infrastructure and port services.

The connectivity index is only a rough tool at best for supply chain planners and logistics pros. One needs to investigate the individual routings used for SKUs, and that requires close cooperation and openness with carriers and any third-party firms you use for logistics management.

Furthermore the routing may change even though the carriers involved are the same. So it’s daily attention rather than autopilot. Perhaps this is a job for AI agents. Almost daily checks may need to be made.

Then, what do you do about it? Do you have the power to force a change? Do you want to pay for the change? These are not easy decisions, but they certainly require attention at operational, tactical and strategic levels.

I would not be surprised to see the emergence of startups that can provide dynamic routing visibility and costing, perhaps with AI agents. Such tools can help in the current world scenario. They are most relevant in the fast-changing world political scenario we are in today. That churn is creating costs for supply chains we couldn’t even imagine two years ago.

Some scenarios around the trade lanes are presented by McKinsey. The following graph shows some basic geographical groupings and three scenarios of activity, called Baseline, Diversification, and Fragmentation (the worst), over the period 2022-2035. Compound annual growth rates could range from +6% (China to emerging markets) to -8% (advanced economies to China). The source here is this web page. Such large adjustments over a long period means there’s a risk of stranding investments in infrastructure, including ports.

The people of the world will be much better served by open trade rather than fragmentation.

Splash December 15, 2025

https://splash247.com/shanghais-box-boom-exposes-a-resilience-blind-spot/

Loose cable connection destroys bridge?

The National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) Office of Marine Safety released a report on the Dali bridge ‘allision’ (not a collision) that destroyed the Francis Scott Key Bridge in Baltimore MD USA.

We all read with amazement at the destruction of this major bridge, which carries much East Coast auto and truck traffic between New York-Philadelphia and Washington DC. The cost to repair it is estimated at well over a billion dollars.

What caused the accident? The ship owner, ship operator, captain, and many insurance providers will be anxious to find out who can be held financially responsible— who is to blame.

The report indicates there was prior knowledge before the voyage of a loose cable connection which could have been responsible for the ship’s major 440V power system blacking out. That could be a cause of the accident since it would include the steering system and engines.

The team performing the investigation had a wide variety of members including the shipbuilder, classification society, flag-state port authorities, shipowner, and ship managers.

It may take a year to get the final report out. So no decisions are possible for quite a while.

It seems like a potential for a loose cable is something that should have been taken care of immediately if discovered. The accident occurred on 26 March. Why was it not discovered and fixed in prior inspections? I believe fixing it would have been time-consuming, causing quite a bit of lost steaming time. Were prior inspections not rigorous enough to disclose such problems? Or were the possibilities simply ignored? Maybe the lawyers will find out! See the second article below. And the US government is getting into the act (third article).

With the bridge repair costs so high, the stakes are large.

Barry Parker, New York Freelance Correspondent

September 14, 2024

https://www.seatrade-maritime.com/accidents/did-a-loose-cable-connection-cause-dali-blackouts-

Sam Chambers September 18, 2024

https://splash247.com/dali-lawsuits-pile-up-in-the-us/

Barry Parker, New York Freelance Correspondent

September 18, 2024

https://www.seatrade-maritime.com/accidents/us-department-of-justice-files-100m-suit-against-dali-shipowner-manager