Tag Archives: supply chains

Quote

DCSA unveils new era of smarter supply chains with track & trace standards

The Digital Container Shipping Association has unveiled its new T&T standard for tracking containers while en route between shipper and consignee.  They are quite detailed and have been planned using some of the latest design thinking techniques, including the definition of personas who might use the system one way or another. They’ve prepared some very nice slide shows to describe at a high level what they are doing.

DCSA was launched by MSC, Maersk, Hapag-Lloyd and ONE last April, with CMA CGM, Yang Ming, Evergreen, HMM and Zim joining a month later. This is a fairly quick turnaround for a first standard delivery.

The catch will be how fast people start sticking to them when building equipment and systems. Doing so can be predicted to help sales, via a network effect– since the standards make systems compatible, there’s less hassle making one system relate to another.  A close review should be done of the standards, to see how many choices individual participants are given to make the information specific to their needs.  Such choices tend to produce systems that lose their compatibility if one of the partners changes, and make specific programming necessary when others try to adapt to the system. It’s the anthesis of cooperation.  And these standards are meant to promote cooperation rather than competition.

An example of the issue can be seen with EDI, in which general record structures are defined, but a lot of latitude is given to provide extra information or different information. The result is that EDI needs to be specially programmed for each pair-wise interaction of companies, a problem that has haunted us for 20 years even though
EDI, in general, was a big step forward.

Let’s hope that we all have learned from the past, and can use the standard to really lubricate information flow in supply chains.

logo

By via New era of smarter supply chains as DCSA track & trace standards are unveiled – The Loadstar
Quote

Asia-Europe rollovers are back

It appears that ocean carriers are again playing fast and loose with delivery dates for cargo.  There’s a telling remark by an NVOCC source: “You might be able to book at that rate, but you have absolutely no idea when you are going to get the boxes shipped.”

Carriers still have not got the message that most shippers want their cargo when it was promised.  There might be a few that can stand a long delay, but the trend in inventory over the last 20 years has been toward rightsizing inventory by factoring in its logistics.  You can’t do that well if there is substantial variation in lead times. The formula for overall variation of inventory— measured by variance (square of standard deviation)— weights variance of lead time by the demand, but variance of demand by the lead time.

Looking at the formula, a mathematical truth deducible simply from the definition of variance and the assumption of independence of demand and lead time distributions, shows that often lead time variation has an outsized effect.

Ocean carriers can’t control the demand, but they can control the lead time. But it seems that they ought to spend more time thinking about how to help keep the customer’s overall variation low, rather than only dealing with what they alone can control.

Time to get on the supply chain thinking boat!  It left the dock years ago!

logo

By 

 via Asia-Europe carriers leave boxes on quays as they eye better-paid cargo – The Loadstar

Quote

Commentary: Cato’s Jones Act numbers wrong

John McCown, a former shipping company CEO and transport hedge fund executive, debunks the faulty calculations in the Cato Institute’s analysis of the Jones Act as it applies to Puerto Rico.

Most container traffic from the US flows from Jacksonville FL to Puerto Rico. Containers headed to Puerto Rico must be carried in US-flagged hulls, due to the cabotage restrictions of the Jones Act.

It appears Cato Institute researchers’ figures are patently wrong, their methodology is flawed, and they have excluded several factors that would affect the Puerto Rico – US container trade link.  Cato researchers came up with an 88% decline in the cost of shipping a container by their flawed technique. But Mr McCown’s spreadsheet says it is more like 10-12%, an amount that is hardly worth junking the Jones Act.

The purpose of the Jones Act is to maintain a capable US maritime segment. It embraces, for instance, container shipping between US ports, US shipbuilding, and US seamen and training, along with the stricter requirements for seamen’s well-being that a US flag puts into effect.

The Cato Institute seems to have aligned itself with some radical allies of the sitting US President. We don’t see why they would be so eager to cook the books on this issue.  And we don’t understand why they insist on repeating their false conclusions even when they have been called into question by a serious critic, on fairly easily ascertainable facts.

It seems as though Cato is falling prey to the fake news fad, and won’t shut their collective mug when they are found out.  It’s a good way to lose everyone’s respect.

 

   via Commentary: Cato’s Jones Act numbers wrong