Category Archives: Shipping

Will emissions pledge sound the death knell for LNG as a fuel?

Amazon, IKEA, Unilever– major names in commerce, and major users of ocean shipping. And others as well, they have signed a pledge to make sure their shipping is zero-carbon powered by 2040.

That’s a long time away, 20 years; the approximate lifetime of a ship. but it means that these shippers will not be booking on LNG powered vessels.

So is LNG-powered shipping marked for extinction?

I think it’s very possible. Aside from its use of fossil fuel, though cleaner than traditional bunkers, there’s the problem of methane emission.That requires even more re-engineering. In the oil field, despite the fact that the technology is readily available, methane emissions and flaring are still common. It’s a governance question. Better to avoid fossil fuel products altogether.

Sam Chambers October 20, 2021

Will emissions pledge sound the death knell for LNG as a fuel? – Splash247

Southern California: more records broken as vessels at-anchor reaches triple figures

Triple figures is worth reporting, even though we’ve been hearing about this problem for a long time now. And it seems no one will put up the money to do something about it.

Opening terminals to 24 hour operation would clearly improve things. It would not be a total solution, because the drayage trucks and warehouses, and container flows and availability, would still need to be coordinated. But it would be a start.

But 24 hour operation for terminals means more longshoremen and staff would need to be employed. Terminals will not be willing to hire these new longshoremen as union workers, because they don’t see a long-term need for them. When the rush abates, they can’t fire them readily.

It’s a similar story for drayage, though they have more flexibility, with the ability to use owner-operators if they can get them. But with the driver shortage, this kind of transport is one of the hardest hit– drayage carriers have been so ready to alter contracts for delivery and pickup of cargo and chassis that drivers don’t want to do this work. They’d rather be doing construction work.

The situation with warehouses is similar. Keeping a warehouse open for extended hours to be sure trucks can get in and out requires more staffing, and the firms don’t want to put out the money. Warehouse workers are often on 90-day contract time frames; many these days are supplied by temp agencies rather than the warehouse operator. The warehouse operator would need to commit to a much larger workforce, and on overtime at that, to handle extended hour deliveries.

I am starting to think it all comes down to businesses not wanting to extend their labor requirements. People don’t want to give work to people, or institutions and rgulations are now flexible enough to allow people to go to work and get the job done.

It’s more than just jawboning the port authorities, who have little to say about their terminals’ operations or labor practices, and almost no influence. Ports themselves have no leverage except as a contract for port spavce comes up for renewal. And most are nmany year contracts. That’s the dilemma of current port governance practice.

19 October 2021 Jack Donnelly Ports and Terminals, Shipping Lines

Southern California: more records broken as vessels at-anchor reaches triple figures – Port Technology International

Maersk looks set to cut out freight forwarders to attract larger BCOs

Well, who would have guessed! Once Maersk built out its systems for booking shipments, it’s natural they would be cutting out forwarders. It’s what forwarders have been saying was going to happen for a while. and with Tradelens, Maersk can offer tracking, but also without involving forwarders.

This upstream cannibalism of customers may work for Maersk. They have worked very hard building their systems to make booking happen. And they are large enough to have a bit of market power over some forwarders.

But so much of all container lines’ traffic comes from forwarders. That part will go down, and more than it might, because forwarders will be bent out of shape and angry at having customers pirated.

I think it most hurts the littler guys, though, both forwarders and shippers.

But doesn’t Maersk have to focus on getting the ships to run on time? Blanking sailings and ships piling up outside ports are indicators of serious supply chain flaws. It would be more important for Maersk and other liner firms to do something about those issues.

Prices cannot continue to be through the roof as they are now, with containers not available or in the wrong place for cargo, or not being able to be moved, without crippling ocean container shipping in the long run.

By Nick Savvides 20/10/2021

Maersk looks set to cut out freight forwarders to attract larger BCOs – The Loadstar